’nother WIP
Printed From: Pixel Joint
Category: Pixel Art
Forum Name: WIP (Work In Progress)
Forum Discription: Get crits and comments on your pixel WIPs and other art too!
URL: https://pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2018
Printed Date: 10 September 2025 at 11:40pm
Topic: ’nother WIP
Posted By: Setzer
Subject: ’nother WIP
Date Posted: 19 April 2006 at 8:20pm
er. post content. WIP animation.
 
First time ever defining a lightsource. By that I mean the moon :p Last frame uses 14 colors. not sure if I'm done or not, so I figured I'd like to hear what you all have to say about it. I personally *love* the cliffside. I've never made a rocky texture that sex in my life. I think the grass is abit bland, but I don't know how to fix it up. anyways, comments, C+C
------------- http://sj-gfx.com">
|
Replies:
Posted By: Blick
Date Posted: 19 April 2006 at 8:44pm
The only thing not shaded is the lightsource, of all things... The moon
reflects the sun's light and if the sun's light is a dark gray to you,
an appointment with the optometrist is in order.
------------- http://punaji.com/">
|
Posted By: Setzer
Date Posted: 19 April 2006 at 9:30pm
updated. 15 colors now. I actually thought the pale blue looked more natural, but I never think about things like that.
------------- http://sj-gfx.com">
|
Posted By: jalonso
Date Posted: 20 April 2006 at 8:10am
I don't see any point for the clouds here. As its a study in light I
would exxagerate the shadow on the tombstone/bottle. The
waterhighlights in a more focused cone would read as nightlight even if
unrealistic (sometimes we must play god)
------------- http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9378&FID=6&PR=3 - PJs FAQ <•> http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_topics.asp?FID=6 - Sticky Reads
|
Posted By: Blick
Date Posted: 20 April 2006 at 8:14am
What I was getting at about the moon is that it should have more luminescence.
------------- http://punaji.com/">
|
Posted By: Bifur
Date Posted: 20 April 2006 at 9:46am
u should use white blue to moons and reflexes , thats what i think and the ramp should be darker
mario style blouds rox
-------------
I know! Leafs shouldn't make shadow...
|
Posted By: Setzer
Date Posted: 20 April 2006 at 8:52pm
my attempt to give it a more night-ish pallete, lost alot of detail and such, including the clouds [though I plan to add them back after I've got other stuff done.] Also the moon now looks as if it wants to kill you.
------------- http://sj-gfx.com">
|
Posted By: jalonso
Date Posted: 20 April 2006 at 9:14pm
I think its much more interesting now
------------- http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9378&FID=6&PR=3 - PJs FAQ <•> http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_topics.asp?FID=6 - Sticky Reads
|
Posted By: Larwick
Date Posted: 21 April 2006 at 4:21am
Much better, indeed. I think the moons expression is more subtle and calm than before. Perhaps have it facing slightly to the left though?
-------------
http://larw-ck.deviantart.com">
|
Posted By: Setzer
Date Posted: 24 April 2006 at 1:11am
slightly to the left works, other misc. parts of the image have been redone as well. I"m starting to think no clouds at all, I think the sky looks more omnious while clear. I might want to get rid of a star or two though.
------------- http://sj-gfx.com">
|
Posted By: jalonso
Date Posted: 24 April 2006 at 1:21am
Setz, I would even remove five or six even more. Their white color is
also probably best with the muddy grey/purple in the moon, or the
purple in the water or that orangy/grey. There are also 5 stray green
pixels on the tombstone that look wrong even if they are supposed to
be moss.
EDIT: Did not notice before but the shadow should really slope in a
curve that matches the mound.
------------- http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9378&FID=6&PR=3 - PJs FAQ <•> http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_topics.asp?FID=6 - Sticky Reads
|
Posted By: Setzer
Date Posted: 24 April 2006 at 1:46am
okay, less stars now, no moss on the grave, I tried to tilt the shadow some, I also tried to make the shine on the water blend abit better.
------------- http://sj-gfx.com">
|
Posted By: jalonso
Date Posted: 24 April 2006 at 10:31am
Its really good now. The shadow works much better, tho I might try a
bit of dithering using the black on the tombstone. The clouds were
never needed. For an even better composition the last thing I would do
is move the moon down 4px and 2px to the left or extend the sky out 4px
on the top, 2px to the right.
------------- http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9378&FID=6&PR=3 - PJs FAQ <•> http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_topics.asp?FID=6 - Sticky Reads
|
Posted By: ..::Naso::..
Date Posted: 24 April 2006 at 12:59pm
its looks kinda weaird that the moon has so little brittness and reflection on the water is to lighter then the moon it self
|
Posted By: MurrMan
Date Posted: 24 April 2006 at 1:55pm
you know what this reminds me of? if you have ever played Chrono
Trigger, when you pour the "pop" over that dude's grave by the sea
shore. Haha, i remember that they censored bear in the american version
by calling it "pop" or "soda". i was clearly a beer mug... Any way
Needs more stars, rocks are perfect, define some waves, and cliff shape looks wierd...
|
|