Hint: just try adding some panties (which can cover what PJ don't want, but still sexy), and voilá!
Not meaning to offend, but anyone can clearly see that this is pornography and that it breaks rule three of the Submission Rules (prominently displayed in the submission form). Thus, I cannot see why it was permitted into the gallery, and I believe it should be removed. 
No it's not.
Henti, don't give up. Just take some time, relax, and get back to it when you feel you're ready. :)
What do you mean by 'nothing to do'? To me it seems that it's quite a lot of work.
What bothers me more are problems in anatomy:
Her left leg bent like it's broken.
Bottom half of left arm twice longer than upper half.
Eyes are absent.
Her right breast points up although in this pose it should hang to (her) right.
Pose is shurely suggestive, but I don't remember any families registering lately to be friendly with them. I seen far worse subjects getting into gallery. After all, it is properly tagged. But technical flaws are too many.
only when "the way they are" means legs spread wide in a suggestive pose, exposing genitalia. We do have younger members at this site, so we try to keep it familly friendly.
@Onek - I see no one in pixel joint accept pictures the way they are :/
There is no pornography here - just naked girl, main subject of art since paleolithic period!