Hahaha, "passive aggressive lady"? If anyone here is being passive agressive it's you and your "warnings" about this kickstarter and while we're on the subject, what exactly are you "warning" people about? 

That this is the second kickstarter? We know that already.

That the author made mistakes? She's explained that already.

It comes off petty when you attack a former employer who isn't actively trying to harm, or rip people off. It comes off petty when you mention; over and over again, "dim financial prospects" for a job that you willingly took and accepted payment for. It's pettiness poorly guised as a warning and now I'm really curious as to why you're going to such lengths to disparage this campaign. Come on, I really though you were better than this =/

Mistakes were made, and lessons were surely learned; there's nothing particularly wrong with this as her intent is earnest. Further, she's done little to twist the truth in any way as to what transpired. She's decided to grow the game further, and for that she needs help. She's also pledged and is (proovably) still working on the rewards for her previous backers. Please do explain what about this people need to be warned about; and while you're at it, please explain your reasoning as to how she's "partially responsible" for the rainfall debacle when all she did was help a former friend in need set up a kickstarter account? 

I don't know man, you always seemed like a cool guy back at GW, but the stuff I'm reading here paints you as a petty, greedy man.