greenraven @ 10/4/2024 15:00 commented on Big Bird

Send me a link I wouldn't mind popping in.



 
greenraven @ 6/30/2024 07:02 commented on Big Bird

Oh sure now you like AI. 



 
greenraven @ 6/20/2024 10:38 commented on Big Bird

I wouldn't say PJ "outlived" anything given that we no longer bundle desktop icons or forum avatars for people to use.

Also this place takes way too much inspiration from twiiter with things like wrongthink to say it outlived it. 



 
greenraven @ 4/26/2024 10:14 commented on Big Bird

That's actually kinda neat. You can really see the difference in shading in those screenshots.



 
greenraven @ 4/23/2024 11:47 commented on Big Bird

You obviously never asked the wrong questions on here. They really don't like it when you have a mind of your own and question the status quo. 

https://imgur.com/AT4KlDA

I have opinions on how this place could be run. And apparently some people feel threatened by the mere existence of opinions. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

PJ used to be so much more accepting and tolerant once....



 
greenraven @ 4/21/2024 10:59 commented on Big Bird

"Good old PJ" had an IRC where everyone was welcomed. Last I checked PJ of today has a discord with some sort of authoritarian vetting process because god forbid you should offend someone by saying oekaki is real pixel art.



 
greenraven @ 2/29/2024 14:11 commented on Big Bird

https://store.steampowered.com/app/2779230/Zarathustra__Cybergeddon/

So apparently this game was made entirely using AI. For those of you who can look past your own insecurities for a few seconds, I highly recommend you give this a try, there's something very beautiful here.

I honestly can't wait to see more games like this.



 
greenraven @ 11/12/2023 07:27 commented on Big Bird

Real fucking mature. 



 
greenraven @ 11/11/2023 09:14 commented on Big Bird

I still don't get why everyone is all up in arms about AI given that real live humans frankensprite and "copyright" ownership over palettes. At least the AI isn't threatening to murder anyone's dog. 



 
greenraven @ 7/13/2023 06:19 commented on Big Bird

No. He stopped replying to everything including his emergency contact and even skype.

It's possible he's still alive but scrubbed his internet identity clean and change his phone number. Because last time I talked to him he was somewhat depressed and said he's going to turn off his phone and go fishing for a week. That was the last I ever heard from him. 



 
greenraven @ 6/19/2023 04:10 commented on Big Bird

Is that a quip you want to make, glass houses and all?



 
greenraven @ 6/17/2023 16:18 commented on Big Bird

I mean frankensprites, recolors, and rips were always a thing. AI just makes that process mildly faster. No one ever freaked out to this extent about bootlegs before when it was just humans doing it.

Yeah it sucks that people are stealing commissions but as long as there's profit to be made grifters gonna grift.

At face value though I don't see anything wrong with AI art. If anything we should be encouraging AI to be more artistic, because we're only a few steps away from living breathing artificial intelligence and real actual thinking machines. AI art is probably the luckiest boon in the field of mechanical sentience.



 
greenraven @ 6/10/2023 08:28 commented on Big Bird

In that case yes, I'm an Ultima fan. XD



 
greenraven @ 6/10/2023 08:04 commented on Big Bird

Do Martian Dreams and Savage Empire count? XD



 
greenraven @ 6/6/2023 16:27 commented on Big Bird

"Civil discussion"? That's rich coming from a place that's too scared to have any actual discussions and feels the need to vet users and kick out people from discord conversations before they even have a chance to say hello. "Civil" right. 



 
greenraven @ 6/6/2023 10:44 commented on Big Bird

How is googling something more informative than asking artists directly? I asked an honest question because I wanted to know what you people thought, not what google is trying to push.

Also not everyone has a twitter account or watches youtubers or reads those "thousands of articles" from clickbait sites like Kotaku, Polygon, or CNN. I just asked a simple direct question. You're making this more complicated that it needs to be.

You can snarl at me all you want, it's not going to change your situation, I'm not responsible for what's happening to you.

@DoubleSBS, I didn't even realize they're making another Duke Nukem game. I thought the franchise was dead.

That first article is actually pretty informative. Thanks.

Is what it is I suppose. It's a new technology in a changing world. There's bound to be some unhappy people in the way of progress.



 
greenraven @ 6/6/2023 05:56 commented on Big Bird

How is it putting artists out of work though? Everyone keeps saying it but I'm not seeing anything.

What mainstream game, what mainstream show or movie, is using AI art?

The only thing I've seen so far are a handful of pieces on reddit, which are 100% free, so no one is losing any money, the only thing it's endangering is egos.



 
greenraven @ 6/4/2023 08:08 commented on Big Bird

Enjoy your karma. 



 
greenraven @ 6/1/2023 07:30 commented on Big Bird

Wrong. Clearly you people haven't seen any decent oekaki.

Because proper oekaki focuses on precision strokes which emulate physical brushes and is more akin to pastel paintings. That takes skill and practice.

Here's a decent oekaki piece, go ahead and try your "sloppy chaotic" nonsense now.

This is why I always advocated against the "1 pixel" rule because PJ is closing itself off from some pretty great art.

I said it before a million times and I'll say it a millionth and one: Oekaki is a legitimate form of pixel art.



 
greenraven @ 5/30/2023 06:02 commented on Big Bird

Whoa whoa, hold on there. So here you are attacking me "defending the old ways" and you've never even heard of "1 pixel at a time"? So why even bother going to town defending an idiology you know nothing about? XD

Also make one of the weekly challenges oekaki, I want to see that now.



 
greenraven @ 5/26/2023 05:27 commented on Big Bird

People who actually want to do their jobs should maybe actually do their jobs then.

One very specific example would be writers of tv shows and movies. A little while ago they went on strike, and I find that hilarious. What exactly did that do to earn their pay in the first place?

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080240/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7942796/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096684/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt17043230/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0105812/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6436620/

Everything in the last decade has just been trite reboots and remakes, almost no original ideas in sight. So at this point, yeah why not turn it over to AI, might actually get something new for a change.

@Reo - It's sad that you think I'm trolling. God forbid people in 2023 be exposed to a different opinion that isn't part of the hivemind. A little debate every now and then is healthy.

Believe it or not but I still care about this place, a little bit, what it used to be at least. The only alien concept is why PJ embraced the wierd lie of "1 pixel at a time". Because I've seen artists from LucasArts and Sierra and a bunch of other places talk about art and they all seem very confused about this supposed "golden rule" of pixel art.



 
greenraven @ 5/25/2023 14:25 commented on Big Bird

Ok, an actual anwer.

Large companies replacing human workers with automation is just something that happens in life. Plenty of other sectors have dealt with it. Time for the art world to step up.

Also when you say "audiences" what do you mean? Movies? Comics? Video games? Traditional paintings? What's the medium for this hypothetical audience? Because depending on what it is it might night be as much of a "huge loss" as it may seem.

Ok so AI speeds up bootlegging. Cool. Get rid of AI and bootleging will still be there, it will just take slightly longer. But people will still find a way to rip people off.



 
greenraven @ 5/25/2023 06:04 commented on Big Bird

Your point being? You must have me confused with someone else because I wasn't hystercial when I deleted my gallery, no one criticized my art, it wasn't a rage quit. You're probably thinking of Dumbo.

Also this deflection doesn't move the conversation forward regarding AI. So congrats on continuing to prove how backwater and irrational this place is, because you can't even defend your ideology in a normal conversation without resorting to personal attacks.



 
greenraven @ 5/24/2023 16:27 commented on Big Bird

Yes but how a tool "is inserted" into society is no different than how an artist "is inserted" into society.

That's why I said what's the difference between an AI doing an art piece and an artist doing an almost 1:1 "reference" piece.

And all I'm hearing is hysterical screaming. Some folks over on DA went as far as removing their entire galleries because they don't want them used as a learning reference for AI, but what's hilarious is that it was always used as a reference by humans.

So again, what's the freaking difference? XD



 
greenraven @ 5/22/2023 18:34 commented on Big Bird

What?