Your image ref link does not work :(

As best as I can recall the reason it was sent back was because a comment or two was left regarding a ref image. It seemed possible that it was a color reduction (based off your gallery quality as a basis).
No reply from you led it to be sent back, to be safe. Unfortunately, several reports were sent regarding questions about it too so again, to be safe, it was rejected.
A possible solution may be to clearly link to ref(s) or even WIP images that clearly show no 'funny bitnez' has occured.

Lets see what others have to say on this thread for now, k.

I happen to have thought the image was ok and only held back because I DO listen to member input and take it into account. Nothing was meant to diss you in any way. The PJ staff also keeps the membership/community in mind too.
I'm on the fence about your avvy because of this dilemma.

*On the bright side you can still use it as your avvy :D

Well here's the bad news: When you get stuff based on other stuff, people tend to jump on the "color redux" wagon.

Here's the good news: It's not a color reduction. The spacing, and the proportions, of the mouth and nose are off, as well as the width of the head is off. Also, there's a definite lack of ears.


^
|
|
V


I say in.

edit:



Shoot first, ask questions later? (Sorry, I know you're just doing your job, I just found that kinda funny and had to share.)


Edited by greenraven - 23 October 2008 at 5:58am

Yeah, I actually have noticed it. Like I said, basing stuff on stuff that's already been done makes these situations kinda tricky.