Diversions | |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Author | Message |
Hapiel
Rear Admiral ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 June 2023 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3266 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 31 August 2014 at 5:30pm |
If we were to remake PJ. From scratch. How would it need to work?
This question has kept me thinking for over 3 years. I love PJ. This system has everything that I need and I know where to find all there is. Sadly its outdatedness is not just a problem that shows on the interface, with advanced hack bots, any website that is not regularly updated is a timebomb. I don't want to open my browser one day to find PJ full of viagra adds, figure that my password & data has been stolen (it probably has already anyway) and that we are never able to use the site again. We need to have a plan B ready! No illusions: I can not create a new PJ. Sedgemonkey can not, nobody I know has the ability to put in these efforts with the resources available (time, money, love, skill). But what if? What would PJ 2.0 look like? Up to date security If the main reason for a new site is better protection against the evils of the web, this should be an important feature. There are 2 options to keep a website up to date: 1: Get a skilled webmaster who can regularly update the system 2: Use a trusted system core that is being updated automatically. Option 1 seems very unlikely, we don't have any money and we can not rely on volunteer(s) to do this forever. A system is just too much effort to maintain. Option 2 seems better. Projects like wordpress, joomla or even the core of this forum are updated all the time and relatively easy to modify. A very good gallery feature This is what makes PJ unique. PJ is not PJ without an open art gallery. One with only pixel art submissions (manual approval..), a weekly & monthly top (based on whatever score, maybe not our current system). Users should be able to submit art and be displayed nicely. I looked around if there was some kind of plug in for one of the existing management systems that was kind of similar to this, none fit perfectly. Is it possible to write a gallery module like this? Would this be a one time action or would this need constant updating too? A weekly challenge feature Of course it is technically possible to manually run challenges, create polls and a timer, but having a system that does most of the work for you makes it easy for volunteer mods to run 52 challenges a year, hand out 1000 medals per year, etc.. PJ's community stays active and bonds because of the challenges. A PJ without challenge would be a huge step backwards. Modules we can copy Forum, Chatbox, private messages, news blog, these features are probably easy to take from other places and install onto this new website. Design Of course a community portal needs a functional design, and an art portal needs a visually appealing design which puts the focus on the artworks. Luckily we have a lot of gifted designers among us, and in the past many have volunteered to create new templates for PJ I have looked around for solutions, but I am not a web expert. As far as I could figure there are plenty of foreign (Indian) companies who were willing to rebuild this complete site for 1500 dollar or less, but I bet there are a lot of tiny things to be fixed or changed after run one and you'll never know if it is an improvement in the end.. Building on an existing core seems much more likely. For example OpenGameArt has been developed completely on top of Drupal, and the website is quite functional right now! Are there people here at PJ with experience in web development who can explain more about how PJ could possibly be rebuilt from scratch? What would your approach be and why? Of course, a new PJ brings much more trouble than just a new system. Imagine starting from 0 with an empty gallery... Or mirroring all the gems in the old forums... As much as I want an open group to be in charge for the technical side of things, on this internet a website needs to be registered by a single person who will automatically ultimately be in charge... The more open, the more sustainable, the better? Anyway, these are some thoughts, feel free to respond to them/correct me/give hope that there might be a chance that PJ will survive! |
|
![]() |
|
andrae
Midshipman ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 September 2017 Online Status: Offline Posts: 43 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think it is possible. A
Sadly, I cant make an input or suggestion in the technical side of things as i have no knowledge about it. *ty, Hapiel Edited by andrae - 01 September 2014 at 4:16am |
|
![]() |
|
Hapiel
Rear Admiral ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 June 2023 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3266 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yep, good example
Both the Portuguese Pixelaria and the French RetroPixel seem to have a working system. Does anyone know something about the history of these sites? If there were people in the French and Portuguese speaking world able to make such sites when there was a need for them, will there also be someone in the English speaking world? Is the need just not big enough yet that no one stepped up? |
|
![]() |
|
thereisnocure
Seaman ![]() Joined: 30 August 2014 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
1. Overhaul the main page
The focus right now is on (mostly irrelevant) news articles ("oh, a new pixel-art necktie!"). The useful news articles (weekly challenges) can be contained as 3 links in the existing weekly countdown box. If we want to keep the news feature, sideline it as a series of links. Remove the chatterbox entirely. Now, fill the empty space left by all that BS with actual ART. The front page should look more like the 'newly submitted art' page, full of thumbnails that direct to recent or popular pixel art. 2. Remove the trophy system ...or at least give the ability to hide those gaudy trophy boxes. 3. Fix the Hall of Fame algorithm Obviously. 4. Less Pixel Purism "Hybrid" works, use of filters, gradients, etc. should be allowed. Half of the badass art I see at TIGsource etc. wouldn't be allowed here. |
|
![]() |
|
AlexHW
Commander ![]() ![]() Joined: 19 June 2019 Online Status: Offline Posts: 285 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think having the forum separated off in to another section of the site kind of hurts the activity on it. Current pixel projects/art being worked on should have attention, and pieces/projects that are finished share the space with that.
So for instance.. try to avoid separating stuff into separate pages.. showcase the finished work like usual, but also have a strip under it that showcased work in progress, along with latest posts under those work in progress(posts to the work in progress that is being shown in the strip).. so like..
|
|
![]() |
|
noaqh
Seaman ![]() ![]() Joined: 03 April 2016 Online Status: Offline Posts: 13 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Originally posted by thereisnocure 1. Overhaul the main page The focus right now is on (mostly irrelevant) news articles ("oh, a new pixel-art necktie!"). The useful news articles (weekly challenges) can be contained as 3 links in the existing weekly countdown box. If we want to keep the news feature, sideline it as a series of links. Remove the chatterbox entirely. Now, fill the empty space left by all that BS with actual ART. The front page should look more like the 'newly submitted art' page, full of thumbnails that direct to recent or popular pixel art. 2. Remove the trophy system ...or at least give the ability to hide those gaudy trophy boxes. 3. Fix the Hall of Fame algorithm Obviously. 4. Less Pixel Purism "Hybrid" works, use of filters, gradients, etc. should be allowed. Half of the badass art I see at TIGsource etc. wouldn't be allowed here. 1.... well the organize of articles was okay. But why remove the chatterbox? ( People can make a quick question there and chill there for fun- remove it only make this place less user-friendly) Front page full of arts? Is clicking upon a link to direct you to a gallery so hard? 2. If you hate Trophy so much, tell the mod to remove it( on your profile of course(FOREVER))... It is something for everyone to admire! :I 3. Hall of Fame is THE All time favourites... of course randomize it sometimes would make page 1 less stale 4. THIS IS A PLACE FOR PIXEL and IT's called PIXELJOINT... idk what do you meant by remove the pixel purism... If you want to post your sketches and HIi-digital so much use the forum WIP or just go somewhere else more open-minded... Pixel is what make Pixeljoint. well Pixeljoint I don't think your suggestions are really helpin at all, sir... It's more like you just want us to be another copy of art gallery site out there... The actual problem is Security, Safety... we better look for a Web-developer first look after things around here... I can tell that Sedge isn't regularly here anymore. Re-design isn't the first priority... |
|
![]() |
|
thereisnocure
Seaman ![]() Joined: 30 August 2014 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
1. Because it's the same 3 people making sexual innuendos 24/7, and it's the first thing people see when they come to the site. It's unprofessional, occasionally vulgar enough to make one cringe, and it takes up space that could be devoted to artwork. There are already forums for just shooting the sh!t.
I don't know what you're talking about when you say 'is clicking a link so hard', what I'm suggesting here is that there is more art displayed, i.e. more links to click and more art to look at. 2. Mods can't remove trophies, and it's tacky. That's why I offered the idea of making it collapsable- it allows people to wag their e-dick if they really want to. 3. You must be very new here, because this conversation comes up a lot. The Hall of Fame is irredeemably broken, everyone agrees on that. It has a heavy preference toward older works, and it's nearly impossible for new work to overcome this barrier. 4. That's the mindset I'm talking about. Pixel art today sometimes takes limited advantage of new tools, or is too 'oekaki' for purist tastes, but the foundations of pixel art as a medium are still the most important element of the image. Blind rules like "[x] tool cannot be used ever" work to teach newbies how to handle the medium, but rules are made to be broken, and there needs to be more exceptions for work that doesn't follow the predefined equation for what makes "TRUE pixel art". Edited by thereisnocure - 01 September 2014 at 9:28pm |
|
![]() |
|
jeremy
Rear Admiral ![]() ![]() Joined: 25 November 2024 Location: New Zealand Online Status: Offline Posts: 1704 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Originally posted by Hapiel Yep, good example Both the Portuguese Pixelaria and the French RetroPixel seem to have a working system. Does anyone know something about the history of these sites? I know that RetroPixel was just a forum initially, it became a gallery site in 2011 |
|
![]() |
|
noaqh
Seaman ![]() ![]() Joined: 03 April 2016 Online Status: Offline Posts: 13 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
you have proved your point... I don't have any other issues with it... to be true... I have a distaste for sexuality and over-skimpy theme of art as well...
And 4. yeah... I don't count myself as a purist. Since I hate any palette less than 18 colors... still with the same techniques one can make an illusionary version of pixel art( I can say one of those is cure and many other) It isn't wrong and of course over use of color is required... still even this 4. is implemented, preferably keepin it at the lowest medium to satisfy certain indiviuals |
|
![]() |
|
jeremy
Rear Admiral ![]() ![]() Joined: 25 November 2024 Location: New Zealand Online Status: Offline Posts: 1704 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I agree that gradients/transparency integrated with pixelart can be quite beautiful when done well; the issue is where the line is drawn as to what is 'too' CG. Worth noting that we've gotten a little more relaxed lately with minor transparency effects. A possible solution which I find kind of distasteful is allowing established artists to bend the rules if they submit sprites or whatever that have CG effects. Would absolutely need to be strict though; otherwise the pixelart aspect kind of disappears
Originally posted by noaqh ( I can say one of those is cure) lol |
|
![]() |
|
noaqh
Seaman ![]() ![]() Joined: 03 April 2016 Online Status: Offline Posts: 13 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
well... I should have know he is cure earlier... so I would have taken the suggestion way more seriously and all. Of course the reason why @thereisnocure appeared is becuz of some idiots hacked the chatterbox and messed up the accounts...( one of em was Cure) So I can tell why he hate the chatterbox now lol
well the chatterbox is running with a thread like system... well said to be old, stale, lame... need a better chatbox with all the features like sound notifications and constant updates( like one of them out there in those fancy forum) |
|
![]() |
|
MrBeast
Midshipman ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 March 2022 Online Status: Offline Posts: 17 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Originally posted by thereisnocure
4. Less Pixel Purism"Hybrid" works, use of filters, gradients, etc. should be allowed. Half of the badass art I see at TIGsource etc. wouldn't be allowed here. It's a good mechanism so that PJ doesn't get flooded by low quality submissions like it is the case on dA and Reddit. It's not like those high quality works can't be submitted here, it just means that the artist has to spend some time to make a filter & gradient less version, which is completely fine. |
|
![]() |
|
jtfjtfjtf
Commander ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 July 2018 Online Status: Offline Posts: 162 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think an "other art" sub forum in the lounge would be nice.
|
|
![]() |
|
jalonso
Admiral ![]() ![]() Joined: 29 November 2022 Online Status: Offline Posts: 13537 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
@jtfjtfjtf,
We've always had an NPA thread. We don't mind NPA, hybrids, experiments, oekaki or anything else. All we do is keep the gallery pure pixels because no other place does. http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1623 @others regarding #4, All we do is keep the gallery pure pixels because no other place does. Everything else is always up for debate and consideration but 'that' as long as I live will never happen. It is a sworn duty that I find non-negotiable. I hope when I can no longer someone else keep this from ever happening wherever pixelart goes or else it'll be gone. For those that disagree. I am old enough that my fight may not be for long. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
thereisnocure
Seaman ![]() Joined: 30 August 2014 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's a blind and arbitrary system. It's fine as a filter, but not as a
strict rule. I'll give PJ credit for becoming more lenient in the last
couple of years, but exceptions have been inconsistent, and I'd still
push for a more inclusive definition. The line between pixel art and
other digital media is already blurry, this is just a discussion of
where in the gray we place the line.
We already have a general quality standard, so "low-quality submissions"shouldn't be an issue. By making artists completely remake huge swaths of a piece, which can dramatically change the effect a piece has, we place a large burden on a lot of good artwork that the artist might not have the time or willingness to dress up. |
|
![]() |
|
greenraven
Commander ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 September 2016 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2598 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Until sedge or an administrator of sedge's rank shows an interest in fixing PJ this is all pointless theorizing and speculation.
So let's harp on semantics and obsessive compulsive behavior.
Thing the second bothers my OCD far more than thing the first. Really people? Is it that hard to keep things neat and tidy? One topic, one place to keep it all, not that hard. Don't make me set the PJ servers on fire. You may go back to talking about politics and religion, or which nSync boy you like best. Because honestly that's all that's ever going to come out of it... for the millionth and one time that this conversation has been had. |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
thereisnocure
Seaman ![]() Joined: 30 August 2014 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's explicitly stated in the first post that the thread is for
hypothetical speculation, and no one expects sedge to implement anything
discussed. The topic you linked to is not about a purely hypothetical
version of the site being made 'from scratch.'
|
|
![]() |
|
Hapiel
Rear Admiral ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 June 2023 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3266 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ah, fuzz! I forgot this was the internet.... ;)
@Green, Of course nothing that comes out of this topic can ever be used for this PJ. I just want to make the road easier to understand for those who will recreate the pixel portal in the future (which I think is inevitable), and I want to find out if there is a chance that we can already start working on it right now (knowing that this chance is very very small). Thanks for the info Jeremy! I guess that is an 'easy' way to get started. @Cure and Alex, I agree with both of you. An art focused website that combines all its great features in a tight overview is the only way we improve upon simple forums and social network groups (facebook/pixel, reddit/pixel etc), and should therefor be our focus. Quality of content is a huge discussion on its own, lets not further investigate on that here. Same goes for 'should we rate art'& trophies. Suggestions are welcome, but rather than bouncing a ball we can stay on topic :) So more on the technical side of things: What does it take to create such a portal? |
|
![]() |
|
Limes
Commander ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 September 2021 Online Status: Offline Posts: 683 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think I actually avoided pixeljoint for several years because you logo royally pissed me off.
|
|
![]() |
|
RAV
Midshipman ![]() ![]() Joined: 26 April 2016 Online Status: Offline Posts: 16 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
If I were asked about the littlest change as is for the biggest bang of the buck, it would be rethinking what the voting on new entries is about really.
I always thought it's weird that the personal gallery space is entirely tied to the public art channel, while voting is scaring people off entirely. So, what if the voting is about whether it's visible in the public gallery on front page, and thus also eligible part of the Hall of fame, monthly and weekly best, challenges, etc. Or that it's just allowed to sit in the private gallery of the user. There still would be a third vote option to entirely reject, since aside from the discussion about what is pixel art, there are plenty of other reasons to reject an entry here. So voting is about public/private/none. I believe that would even make it possible to be stricter about pixel purism instead of lenient, since you have a "saving grace" option in the middle that gets people a first foot into the scene. Psychologically, new users have more motivation to try and tailor some of their works to PJ's standard public, since they don't feel tumbling from just flat out rejection, rather there's a better chance they get hooked on volition that at least feels more free. Vets don't have to see the pixel/noise ratio degrade in public gallery, PJ gets to represent first its own standard to the art, and what people upload into their personal gallery "out of contest" is their own business. Now this idea isn't ideal. it's not what I'd like to see in a full blown next gen PJ2.0 with several categories of obviously related art that are truly "Joint" in one place, as the name would suggest. But more of a pragmatic solution to the situation at hand. Edited by RAV - 13 September 2014 at 6:45am |
|
![]() |
|
Daruda
Commander ![]() ![]() Joined: 03 February 2015 Online Status: Offline Posts: 103 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, I know how to build a site/forum so I'll tell you what are the main problems.
1)Get an admin and update the site or install a new platform, or build another pixeljoint in another server. 2) I'm quite sure if we want to change platform, since asp now isn't one of the main choices, we will make the site cancel all the old information. All the pixel art cancelled, all the forum topics cancelled and we lose credibility with the searching engines. 2.1) There is the need to choose between buying a platform that have already most of the things we need and is regularly updated, then change it and add the gallery, edit the homepage etc. Or to use a free platform that need a lot of fixes and it's not assured to be update regularly. |
|
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
||
Forum Jump |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |