Print Page | Close Window

Helping Souly with Science homework.

Printed From: Pixel Joint
Category: The Lounge
Forum Name: Diversions
Forum Discription: Get to know your fellow pixel freaks. Chat about anything to do with video games, comic books, anime, movies, television, books, music, sports or any other off topic bs you can think of.
URL: https://pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2229
Printed Date: 12 September 2025 at 4:19pm


Topic: Helping Souly with Science homework.
Posted By: Souly
Subject: Helping Souly with Science homework.
Date Posted: 23 May 2006 at 9:07am

Science is my worst subject...
I do science at home, so I have no teachers to help me.

I'm having problem with 5 questions in this whole booklet of 50 questions.

1. Jacki's friend claims that future improvements in engine design will allow vehicles to travel any distance engineers want on just 1L of gasoline.
Is Jacki's friend correct? Why or Why not?

2. For an electric toothbrush, is input energy equal to useful output energy?
Explain your answer.

3. Which of the following would not produce more electricty when a magnet is moved back and forth through a coil of wire.
A - Adding more coils
B - Using a strong magnet
C - Moving the magnet faster
D - Using a longer wire

4. Moving a magnet through a coil of wires converts ___________ energy into ___________ energy.

5a. Complete the following.

___________ -> Generator -> ___________

b. Name the converter in the above system.



-------------
http://punky.ensellitis.com">
I am the jesus of PJ.



Replies:
Posted By: Pixel_Outlaw
Date Posted: 23 May 2006 at 9:25am

1. No, there is a physical limit to fuel consumption effeciency

2. no imput(batteries) is always > output the batteries, you  can't have a 100% efficenctcy on any known system

3.D

4 m,echanical , electric

 

// just a guess on 5

power, generator,work

 



-------------
http://www.shmup-dev.com/forum/">


Posted By: Souly
Date Posted: 23 May 2006 at 9:29am

Originally posted by Pixel_Outlaw

1. No, there is a physical limit to fuel consumption effeciency
2. no imput(batteries) is always > output

1 and 2 require explinations. D:
They expect me to fill up the blank space they give me.

1. Jacki's friend claims that future improvements in engine design will allow vehicles to travel any distance engineers want on just 1L of gasoline.
Is Jacki's friend correct? Why or Why not?

________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________



-------------
http://punky.ensellitis.com">
I am the jesus of PJ.


Posted By: Souly
Date Posted: 23 May 2006 at 9:29am
Oh, and thank you for the other answers. <3

-------------
http://punky.ensellitis.com">
I am the jesus of PJ.


Posted By: Pixel_Outlaw
Date Posted: 23 May 2006 at 9:30am
I revised and thatnk you for the chance to get more post counts!

-------------
http://www.shmup-dev.com/forum/">


Posted By: Shark
Date Posted: 23 May 2006 at 9:55am
2: some energy will be lost as heat and sound therefore will not be
totally efficient.

-------------
Snark, we love yuu.


Posted By: PixelSnader
Date Posted: 23 May 2006 at 10:33am

i thought  energy -> generator -> electrical energy

 

like how a windmill converts wind to electricity, and how waterdam-things work



-------------

▄▄█     ▄▄█
▄█▄     ▄█▄




Print Page | Close Window