Revision needed for Moon_avatar
Printed From: Pixel Joint
Category: The Lounge
Forum Name: Resources and Support
Forum Discription: Help your fellow pixel artists out with links to good tutorials, other forums, software, fonts, etc. Bugs and support issues should go here as well.
URL: https://pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3121
Printed Date: 13 September 2025 at 11:16am
Topic: Revision needed for Moon_avatar
Posted By: Onigashi
Subject: Revision needed for Moon_avatar
Date Posted: 01 October 2006 at 1:31pm
"Revision needed for Moon avatar
REASON: If you use a detail image the small image should match."
@Moderator
What do that mean? Pleas explain what was the problem. Details please. I think that there isn't any problem with this art... (anyway it was used as "small image" too)

|
Replies:
Posted By: Monkey 'o Doom
Date Posted: 01 October 2006 at 1:41pm
For images less than 100x100px, you don't need the detail image. I think the inclusion of this is the problem.
------------- http://pixelmonkey.ensellitis.com">
RPG is numberwang.
|
Posted By: pixelblink
Date Posted: 01 October 2006 at 2:25pm
your detail image and your thumbnail image are not the same at all. hence:
"Revision needed for Moon avatar
REASON: If you use a detail image the small image should match."
it's pretty clear to me.
-------------
|
Posted By: Onigashi
Date Posted: 01 October 2006 at 3:24pm
@pixelblink lol, ive used EXACTLY same pic for small and detail images. May this be a problem? I'm pretty shure I've seen a lot of images here, using same image for both small and detail.
@monkey u cant submit art without selecting the small image. Even if it's possible, small image will look same as detail. Which is what ive done, ive get same pic for small and detail.
EDIT: Hmm... the detailed image is >optional< i think this may be the problem. Anyway my other pic smaller than 100x100 was submited same way as Moon_avatar (chosen both small and detail to be the same). Resubmited Moon_avatar, waiting for approval.
|
Posted By: pixelblink
Date Posted: 01 October 2006 at 4:21pm
this is how it looked 1 min ago:

meanwhile it seems the thumbnail has changed to its proper form. Case closed. Thanks for reuploading the proper thumb
-------------
|
|