It was not an attack it was a simple question to a vague statement which I wanted clarified before adding to the gallery because 'copying' other's work is art theft and we protect all artists.

It was very rude of you to attack him like that, and you didn't even apologise afterwards. Thanks for reminding me why I'll never post my stuff here.

Oh that. I understood you had traced some other pixelartist's horse which is, of course, not allowed.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=muybridge&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjbpZqys-HKAhWB7BQKHTS2DQMQ_AUIBygB&biw=1920&bih=911

How 'copied' is the horse?
Do you have a link to the original you used?

Thanks for the crit, I apreciate your feedback and agree with most of  your comments. The horse was copied from Muybridge.

The animation quality difference between the horse and the person is very noticeable. Did you use reference for the horse but not the person? If you used reference, you should mention it, and link to it if possible.

The character appears to be floating. Their movement doesn't correspond well to that of the horse, and doesn't have anywhere near as much energy as it probably should.

The horse appears to change colour from frame to frame, and the highlight on its hind disappears. The highlights on the neck also change so much that it looks like it's got snakes wriggling beneath its skin, there's just too much movement there. I understand that some of this is from shadows falling differently as the horses's musculature changes shape in motion,  but it also seems like you just copied accidental colour artefacts from a ref, or otherwise stuck to your ref too closely, to the detriment of the anination's consistency.