Living in Miami has its benefits, isn't Jal?

bueno, siendo uno de los pocos que en verdad habla español, creo que puedo asumir la conduccion de todo esto. aunque yo creo que ya esta todo mas que claro. en pocas palabras tets, pixeljoint esta dedicado al purismo de la tecnica del pixelart. en ello esta fuertemente arraigada tanto la tecnica, como el proceso como el resultado final. los edits, por muy distantes que sean del original, tienden a ser simplemente eso, una mera modificacion del trabajo de alguien mas, y por ende, te estas robando parte del credito ajeno(en sentido figurado).
 hace poco, uno de los Sprites de Adarias fue subido como un edit, pero con la diferencia de que el autor del mismo pidio autorizacion a Adarias y trato de contactarse con el. y siendo que Adarias dio su permiso publico, todo siguio como tal. el caso aquies distinto, ya que estas editando el sprite de un juego del que dificilmente podrias tener una autorizacion para utilizar, ya el que para mas mala suerte no mencionaste en la descripcion(lo que da paso a asumir que es de tu autoria cuando no lo especificas, cosa que no es asi).
 es muy, pero muy importante que des el credito correspondiente al original que has utilizado para tu pieza, ya sea por una referencia, por tomar colores prestados, o por el simple actor de buena fe de compartir el merito. creeme que te ahorras cualquier malentendido, y cierras cualquier boca malintencionada.
 ojala que si esta pieza es retirada, eso no signifique un menoscavo en tu contra, o en tu deseo de seguir subiendo trabajos al sitio. por el contrario. aunque el diseño original esta perdido intrinsecamente, hay muestras claras de que no es necesario, y que por si solo/a puedes hacer tus trabajos sin la necesidad de una base ajena.

slaudos
~Metaru
(P.S.: It's good to be the only one arround who knows spanish :D)

I will post it on Sprites INC! Thanks.

Hey, cool animation, thanks for that.

That's true, but it's still an edit.

Tets, if you want some (more) glorry for this edit, I HIGHLY suggest posting it in the Sprites INC forums. (http://www.sprites-inc.co.uk/forum/index.php)

Well I think that the edit was more of what people do with dolls. The original one looks more like a base to me rather. A lot of it was changed, some areas were kept the same but only within the linework so that the coloring and design was completely different.

I activated it, but then saw your previous post with the reference, and then sent it back.  I don't know who re-activated it.

Or re-re-activated it.  What a mess.

Aight cool that all makes sense, thanks BOB. good luck to you guys in your discussions.

Again, I'm quite aware of the fact of it's EXACT resemblance. I sent it back for revision. But it wasn't me who activated it. We ARE looking into this, to put it in it's correct place...(please keep comments to a minimum on this piece specifically, as I don't think some of us want a another flame war to erupt...)

Thanks again...

So many identical pixels. Surely it's a very nice edit, and actually shows a good deal of skill, but it's still an edit.

This WAS submitted back in 06'. However, it was reported by another member as an edit(which it basically, and very well could be). I sent it back for revision. However, during the time of revision, another mod(who shall be nameless) I guess accidentally resubmitted it/activated it, causing the system to believe it was a recent entry. I'm guessing with all the gathered ratings it had in the past, activating doesn't seem to lose these ratings, shooting it up to the stars, apparently in the weekly showcase. I'm still skeptical about it, but it's being discussed. Some of the square heads are currently thinking about tightening up what should be submitted here at this website...

Thanks for the interest...

I agree with Hatch, I've looked at this piece a million times before and now it's like it's been renewed and thrown into the weekly showcase? and then proven an edit? Could someone explain (in English?)

*threw Jalonso's text into a translator and i'm even more confused.

Hey, weekly showcase!!! Cool!

Why hasn't this been removed?

EDIT: Actually, what's going on with this piece? It says it was submitted back in 2006, and indeed, there are comments from back then, but it's on the weekly showcase...?

Gracias, Jalonso, por la explicación.

And Tets, I didn't mean to offend, just to make sure that references are used whenever chances are given, as they will definitely ease any other user attacks towards your piece's integrity. It's pretty much a proven fact, given the many times it's already happened in the past. Good luck, and hope to see more original art from you.

P.s. Jalonso, if you use an online translator, the line "happy new year" is machine translated as Happy new anus...yay for new anuses!!! Ha hah hahh...

Es posible que no entendistes lo que B.O.B trato the expresar.
Es costumbre dejar saber que algo es basado en el arte de otro artista. Es obio que has hecho algo original. Pero debes admitir que el rostro es simplemente una copia del original, cual B.O.B ensena el ejemplo.
Lo mismo ha pasado con su ultimo pixel del la muchacha robot. Hiciste un pixel original pero fue basado en el original de otra persona. No mencionastes esto pero otros miembros si lo hicieron.
No se encuentra mucho problema en usando referencias par crear algo nueveo pero es deseable mencionar que se uso porque cuando no lo haces se puede pensar que eres un ladron or que escondes algo. Cuando haces esto es muy facil en pensar que nunqua haces algo original y tus pixels entonces no se respentan.
Aunque no lo creas se te ha tratado de ayudarte no 'flame you'. Felicidades que te fuen bien en otro sitio web. Aqui eso no importa. Solo los modos teqnicos importan. Por eso es un sitio enfocado en arte pixel solamente. Puro arte pixel.
Lo ultimo que deseo decir es que todos los moderadores aqui tienen vidas. Tambien somos artistas nosotros. Debes de cer mas agradecidos que qualquiara persona te ha prestado algun tiempo, bueno o malo. Si somos ideaticos porque el foco es en los meritos tecnicos sobre el pixel art. No es en lo bonito que algo puede cer.
My castellano es terrible pero espero y deseo que comprendas el punto essencio que paso aqui. No es personal, porque nada es personal, no te conocemos en vida real. Como todo, es tecniquo.

Feliz ano nuevo y en el futuro simplemente usa el area de descripcion para poner un link a imagenes que has usadocomo referencias, especialmente cuando es identico.



*w00t \o/, I did a whole paragraph in spanish, my teacher would be so proud... maybe

Please state references...UPDATED LINK...

Edits are fine for practice and other websites, just NOT THIS ONE. We here at PJ would rather the artist and members grow using natural techniques, rather than become another anime clone artist, with no imagination or idea of his own. So again, only send in work that is completely yours, and if there is some inspiration(or close resemblance), than it'd be wise to link the reference photo in the description, to save you the hassle...(sending back for revision)

Strike numero uno...

Amazing artwork  

nice, but the hair doesnt look like hair, i could swear.

Nice colors and anatomy, but don like his hair