Long distance relationship gonna kill you

Long distance relationship gonna kill you

You need to be logged in to rate pixel art.

 

Pixel Art Details

Long distance relationship gonna kill you



user
Title: Long distance relationship gonna kill you
Pixel Artist: Arylic  (Level 4 Lieutenant :: 2303 points)
Posted: 1/9/2009 21:00
Palette: 16 colors
Statistics:  17 comments    0 faves    0 avatars

Well here is a piece which i admire the most.....

Discussion

If you would like to comment you will need to be logged in. Register now. It only takes a moment and it's free.


user
balls01 (Level 5 Killer Klown) @ 1/26/2009 07:41
sorry another grumpy pixel jointian,

ive seen your pieces come and go, i leave them when it comes to voting because im such a nice person i decide to not vote at all than vote no. your still lacking in most aspects of pixel art, dithering, i say should only should be used on 'close-ish' colors so no clashing becomes present, lines, your lines apsolutely horrible! ive seen my brother do better, when hes drunk and listening to his thrash metal. (he does draw a killer male genital). black, my most dreaded color/shade (to those specifical ones) i say never use it! me myself i have gone through atleast 30 pieces with only using black as the outline at the most. anatomy, yeah rar, rar, rar, concept is nice but how it anatomically comes to me, if i was you i would be disgraced with how bad your anatomy skills are.

i agree with Gil go back to pen and paper, i am constantly still.

user
Arylic (Level 4 Lieutenant) @ 1/13/2009 02:32
Ok updated all the mistakes i made and reduced dithering.

user
Arylic (Level 4 Lieutenant) @ 1/12/2009 19:52
I know what i am doing and i am even better then some people here.

user
Gil (Level 6 Major) @ 1/12/2009 17:49
Looking at your art you don't need intermediate tutorials yet. Start with the basics. In fact, I suggest you go back to pencil and paper, because I think you lack a lot of fundamental art skills needed for pixel art...

user
Arylic (Level 4 Lieutenant) @ 1/12/2009 16:43
Ok, thanks guys , also do you have any good intermediate tutorials in suggestion ?

user
LARGames (Level 1 Gangster) @ 1/12/2009 07:52
http://www.derekyu.com/?page_id=218
The power of the search engine.

-Luis

user
Arylic (Level 4 Lieutenant) @ 1/11/2009 16:58
Do you have a link buddy ?

user
Damian (Level 10 Operative) @ 1/11/2009 04:53
YES, cleaning up your line art, it has many problems. Look for Derek Yu's tutorial. Its awesome.

user
Arylic (Level 4 Lieutenant) @ 1/10/2009 15:01
Ahhh....thanks for your comments guys ill try to improve my work in the future. IS there anything i should learn from my mistakes in this rather than dithering ?

user
Metaru (Level 8 Brigadier General) @ 1/10/2009 13:02
no.

this should never be accepted in the 1st place. unpolished, unrefined, lacking technique and quality, lack of work, care and a long list follows. what this means is that this needs a lot, a lot more work to be really considered as pixelart itself. i am surprised how the heck did this thing went past the queque, and, as a friendly advice, i'd rather take it out of it not only because its "bad"(technique-wise), but also because allowing such unrefined and poorly executed pieced encourages the one behind it that they are right and well done, when they are not. specially when you start doing your first pixels, such things can determine how are you going to develop your works in the future. this had to be rejected in order to make arylic rework it, study a bit more and why not post it on the WIP forums to get some food back to put it on the right track. its not meant to be some sort of blatalant elitism of pixelocracy, but rather making you the favor of being honest and giving you a no with a good set of reasons.

 inb4 defensive rant: no, pixeljoint is not attacking you or your style or your concept. we are mainly focused in the technique aspect of pixel art, and for that is that we want to be honest with you, rather than giving a lame set of fake pink flowers encouraging you to continue on what is already wrong.

user
Platnium (Level 1 Depressed) @ 1/10/2009 10:24
As everyone else the there is too much dithering, and you said "So that  it has a rough texture and a tone of light." So he has rough skin rough clothes a rough hat rough shoes and a rough stick?

user
Damian (Level 10 Operative) @ 1/10/2009 09:34
I don't agree to your last reply.
Your understanding of Dithering is obsolete and so the point behind what you tried to do serves no real purpose.
I agree 100% with Jeremy. It does, it reflects the environment of nothingness, but only light to far away source. That comment seems to have come from your ass, not only does it not make sense, but it is also outright stupid. Nothingness is not an environment, that and light would depict the opposite of nothingness. Light conveys volume and colour and so this would not be seen as nothing.

Also It does it reflects the environment of nothingness but only light to far away source. hahaha, what a lame excuse. Look, we as people looking at your work see this as something over dithered and nothing else. Why can't you see that?


And lastly. I can't see why this was accepted?! seriously though, It's not good enough, noire is it near finished. The dithering is used mindlessly, the line art doesn't fit the rules of pixel artand is so unfinished, the background was drawn with a brush or the pencil at a bigger size than 1px. Overall you are pissing me off! Fix this and don't be lazy! I don't see other unfinished crap work posted on an art gallery..

Well hope that helps jim

user
Arylic (Level 4 Lieutenant) @ 1/10/2009 03:11
@ the b.0.b - I know its over dithered but that's the main purpose behind this piece... its meant to reflect the full use of dithering and act as some sort of shadowing. So that  it has a rough texture and a tone of light.

@ jermy - It does it reflects the environment of nothingness but only light to far away source.
@namre - Yes sir...lol

@ Metaru - i know, i have a specific reason to use that much dithering.

user
Metaru (Level 8 Brigadier General) @ 1/10/2009 02:12
youshould start looking for some tutorials to learn the most basics aspects of pixel art. the resources section of the forum is full of them, so you should start doing some reading to have a better start

user
Namre (Level 1 Jukyu) @ 1/10/2009 01:18
I'm kinda new to pixel art so the comments here are also helpful to me in the future. So no dithering unless you want it for texture, got it.

user
jeremy (Level 11 Sphinx) @ 1/10/2009 00:23

That background really serves no purpose at all. Your outlining is haphazard and the entire thing is overdithered.

Also, this has 18 colours I believe. 


user
The B.O.B. (Level 11 Master Assassin) @ 1/10/2009 00:02
I think you overuse dithering in much of your pieces, way too much. I'd try flat shading some of your pieces, build some volumes, and attempt making a piece which has NO dithering whatsover, as practice. Remember, dithering is also used as a visual texture, so sometimes, it isn't very wise to use on objects that are smooth in real life, unless it really calls for it.

Related & Tags


long distance, pixel art, oldman, love, Long distance relationship gonna kill you avatars, Long distance relationship gonna kill you icons, Long distance relationship gonna kill you pixel art, Long distance relationship gonna kill you forum avatars, Long distance relationship gonna kill you AOL Buddy Icons

Sponsored Products

Donate

Want to give some dough back to all those amazing pixel artists? Donations provide prize money for contests, help cover hosting costs and support new initiatives.

Farm Fresh Sketch Comedy
Play party games with QuizBash app
Play party games with QuizBash app

Report Problem

If you are going to report an issue with this piece please provide relevant URLs/Images to back up your claim on PJ Discord.

Register

If you would like to be a team player why not register? It's quick and easy and you'll be able to comment on, rate and upload pixel art.

Already Registered?