Not Pixel Art, and i agree with tomic and sharprm.I think that should not appear here, is a great logo, but not here.
sloppy overpixeled color redux =/
stray pixels, zero detail - logos like this normally feature something ilkke once called 'shape bluffing', this lacks it!
seems like you've initially invested lots of passion in it, but came to your limits when it came to making pixel-art out of it.
hi welcome to the forum. I'm going to assume this is color reduced (sure looks like it). Color reducing is semi-okay! I'm not a moderator (wait for 'The B.O.B.' for official advice) but I would suggest this isn't enough like pixel art. What do I mean?
Have you used a color ramp similar to the ramp if you did this by hand?
Is it neat like if you did this by hand?
Does it have 'trademark' pixel art features like highlights, antialiasing, ditherpatterns (the nice kind, not the automatic kind)?
Here is an example in the red square: http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e199/sharprm/tag.png
Though that is my lazy example, you can clean it up much more!
P.S. please show how you made the pic (eg. i did this in photoshop) to show that this is your work (and not someone elses, becuase color reducing other people's stuff is LAAAAAAAME {some people actually do that!})
I agree with DawnBringer. This look converted from 24-bit (or 8-bit 256 greyscale). "random" isolated pixels near sharpen colours zones. Not far ago I use similar method to create "pixelart" ... but some people backing me to good way ;)
But, from the other side, dezign of Your graffiti is kewl :) I like it.
If people insist on posting color-reduced Photoshop pieces I whish they could at least clean up the palette and remove redundant colors/pixels. There is also some weird dithering in the image...but I can't tell if this is a result of processing or an "artistic choice". The creation is nice and the author clearly gifted...why not use a bitmap-editor next time?
well, nicely done but, looked ad some places rushed. keep it up :) maybe you can post a wip?
you hit the nail ;D
i've invested a few minutes in looking more closely on the picture than i was able to do at work recently..
..with the conclusion that
a) this is 1oo% not pixeled (so obvious - i don't get why this still in the gallery.. or better: ever got in!),
b) this is most certainly ripped and only the creator of the original knows what the logo is really saying.
it's definately NOT saying "scufe"..
i'm pretty sure that the 2nd letter is a "T". dunno about the first letter - seems like it's two letters merged into one organic capital - maybe an "e" for the upper line and an "s" for the 2nd line.. making it "etoufe pso" or something. i've searched the web for numerous combinations, but had no luck yet - maybe because the whole thing was cutted from a larger logo or has somehow been re-arranged.
something is very fishy here.
p.s. you are tracking IPs here right? is it possible to you to check if this user is really from ireland or maybe.. germany? (where the another recent "MichaS" is from)