 |
| ||||||||||||
So.. Wud I then post it at the description? Because it was enough hard, hair-pulling work to make this hollow, which, then I had to add the font in there along side some prites, which was STRESSFUL. And I'm already too stressed after what happened earlier (Don't want to tell). I mean, because what about this? - http://www.pixeljoint.com/pixelart/48898.htm?
... Ahh. My head hurts.
people shouldn't have to research to find the credit, it should be present alongside the piece.
I'll change the Preview, but I had linked an account to my DA Profile, and all credit is given there.
sending this back again. the preview wasn't made by you, and there are several pieces that at the very least require crediting the original artists or source material.
staff will be discussing the piece in the meantime.
it feels kind of rough, but the Robotnik and exagerated Sonics in the upper right are awesome.
I'm digging that robotnik, and the modified classic designs beside him.
much better, there are still original sonic sprites not created by you in this image, however (submission rule #1). It'd be best to remove them entirely, but if you felt it was necessary to show the original sprite in comparison to your own, you could write something like "official nintendo sprite", and ensure that it clearly points to the sprites in question.
well so long as it's being revised,
the text should be pixelled by hand, though really I see no reason to include the sega sprites in this case. for the purposes of citing your references, it would probably be easiest to work in a number system then have the numbers repeated in the description, with the links to the refernce posted beside them. links to all references used must be present in the description of the piece.