I was a beginner when I made this, and I did photo trace and use a lot of colors, but I've improved since then and I don't seen anything wrong with what I made. Do you enjoy going around criticizing art that someone spent hours on and put a lot of work into? It may not be up to your standards, and I appreciate constructive criticism, but all you've done is tell me what's wrong with it in a rude way.

I agree with shadow wolf, and halfly with shark,. i think this is somehow pixeled, but not with too many skill

most likely this is a photo trace. nothing against them, but next time please inform unknowing people about that.

I think that you cold do a lot better on the shading, and detailing (the folds look good, but those are pretty easy when you have placement ref./trace) you use a very, VERy big amount of colours, of which most are just used for a 1 or 2 pixel line.

Then, the details are.. well.. missing actually. if you look at the piece 1x, it looks like a photo that had been hit with the blurry stick. look at his eyes, mouth, the overall head actually, and you'll see that it is all very bland and plain and .. welll.. blurry

AA-ing is not about ''how to make something look not edgy by blurring it'' but more ''how to put lpixels on a line/area as to make it look smooth though not blurred''

.. i should make tutorials about it sometime =P

and lastly, your colourschemes appear pretty linear, try adding some more hue shifts

Your an idiot if you think its a photo shark. Zoom in why don't you? Check out the shading, the new, the face, the jacket. Definitely pixelled.

this is just a photo.

Well, maybe it actually WAS a photo and he edited it so it looks drawn....

It's a bit too good to be true......

Amazing Realism.

This is... Awesome. At first I thought it was like a photo or something, the detail on the shirt is brilliant. But I think you should see what it looks like with a shaded jacket. Nice work.