Approval Question
Printed From: Pixel Joint
Category: The Lounge
Forum Name: Resources and Support
Forum Discription: Help your fellow pixel artists out with links to good tutorials, other forums, software, fonts, etc. Bugs and support issues should go here as well.
URL: https://pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1820
Printed Date: 09 September 2025 at 5:54pm
Topic: Approval Question
Posted By: pixelblink
Subject: Approval Question
Date Posted: 14 March 2006 at 1:37pm
Who thinks the admins should be more judgemental and stringent when going through the approval process on the main site? Should we be rejecting more pixels directing more members to the forums for WIP approval? Should we be a bit more lax and let pretty much anything that is pixel art through approval?
Just curious on your guys' thoughts. Please keep this thread clean and post thoughts related directly to my questions and ideas.
|
Replies:
Posted By: Monkey 'o Doom
Date Posted: 14 March 2006 at 1:40pm
I think maybe there should be a way to redirect low quality art to the WIP section, but then we really would need a defined set of criteria for work being submitted to the gallery.
------------- http://pixelmonkey.ensellitis.com">
RPG is numberwang.
|
Posted By: pixelblink
Date Posted: 14 March 2006 at 1:41pm
What do you think that criteria should be?
-------------
|
Posted By: 0xDB
Date Posted: 14 March 2006 at 2:00pm
I don't think there should be any raised standards.
Like i said on the chatterbox, a "vote for revision" button would be nice.
That could, if enough votes get in, either automatically suggest the
artist to get feedback on the forums or only report the piece to an
admin to decide whether to take it out of the gallery or not.
off-topic:
(i hadn't read yours and Bisques chatterbox entries when i made my last
one there, so that comment wasn't made because of stubborness on my
side, just because it took me so long to write it)
------------- http://www.dennisbusch.de/index.php - 0xDB | https://twitter.com/dennisbusch_de - twitter
|
Posted By: Monkey 'o Doom
Date Posted: 14 March 2006 at 2:05pm
I'm not really sure, and I think that is an issue; there's a fine line between a heavily stylized peice, and a total heap of trash, and different people intrepret styles differently, leading to possible misunderstandings. Some pieces that receive great comments in the gallery often get equally degrading comments; take http://www.pixeljoint.com/pixelart/4708.htm?sec=rating - this piece as an example. The problem with setting any real criteria is that they are, by definition, based on personal opinion, and may be unacceptable for some people, while being someone else's firm belief.
*Whoo* long post!
Edit: dang, someone beat me to reply. lol
------------- http://pixelmonkey.ensellitis.com">
RPG is numberwang.
|
Posted By: Dra_chan
Date Posted: 14 March 2006 at 2:40pm
I think that as long as the person is not cheating or ripping art off,
it is ok to let them post their stuff. Of course the piece should show
that at least the person put some effort into it, even if it doesn't
look that good.
The hall of fame and the rating system is to separate the good stuff
from the bad stuff, I don't think that anybody should be denied the
opportunity to display their work, if they think they have finished the
piece. If the piece needs lots more to be done, people can always
suggest (in a polite way) to ask for feedback in the WIP forum, or give
it right there in the gallery if it's not much.
|
Posted By: pixelblink
Date Posted: 14 March 2006 at 3:43pm
Okay, some good points are brought up so far.
I have a task for everyone:

Which would you approve and why? Which wouldn't be? What would be your response to the member if they felt you were in the wrong?
Be honest, be brutal... these images are done by me and are intended to be a part of this discussion only. Feel free to rip them apart
-------------
|
Posted By: Dra_chan
Date Posted: 14 March 2006 at 3:51pm
I would take 4, 5 and 6, because 1, 2, 3 are just doodles, done in less
than a minute, or so it seems. Wait, what if pixelblink is really a
n00b and made it in, like one hour?O_o Now I have an
existencialist question. But anyways, 1, 2, and 3 is not pixelart.
|
Posted By: Monkey 'o Doom
Date Posted: 14 March 2006 at 4:01pm
I would take 4, 5, and 6 also, but I would suggest improvement for 4 and 6, as the hair looks odd, and number 4 has a hard-to-describe problem with the blocks of color. I would accept 2 if it was more round, had a clean outline, a fill color, and some AA.
------------- http://pixelmonkey.ensellitis.com">
RPG is numberwang.
|
Posted By: Monsoon2D
Date Posted: 14 March 2006 at 4:05pm
Originally posted by Dra_chan
Wait, what if pixelblink is really a
n00b and made it in, like one hour?
Then it's a practice piece; that doesn't make it submit-worthy, per say. (Not sure if that question was meant to be taken literally or jokingly.)
6 is the only one that I see as a submittable piece.
4 is borderline. It looks complete, but not fine-tuned.
5 is okay, but it gives us the sense that it's a WIP. The artist shows us that s/he knows how to anti-alias, meaning that s/he's studied. (A definate plus.) I'd let 5 slide if the artist stated that it was, in fact, a WIP and that s/he will be adding hair or what have you. Otherwise, I'd say "no go".
I'm a hard-ass.
|
Posted By: Dra_chan
Date Posted: 14 March 2006 at 4:15pm
Originally posted by Monsoon2D
Originally posted by Dra_chan
Wait, what if pixelblink is really a
n00b and made it in, like one hour? Then
it's a practice piece; that doesn't make it submit-worthy, per say.
(Not sure if that question was meant to be taken literally or jokingly.) 6 is the only one that I see as a submittable piece. 4 is borderline. It looks complete, but not fine-tuned. 5
is okay, but it gives us the sense that it's a WIP. The artist shows us
that s/he knows how to anti-alias, meaning that s/he's studied. (A
definate plus.) I'd let 5 slide if the artist stated that it was, in
fact, a WIP and that s/he will be adding hair or what have you.
Otherwise, I'd say "no go". I'm a hard-ass.
I was joking, hehe, of course pixelblink is not a n00b, and I also
don't go calling people n00b seriously. Anyways, you are right in the
previous study thing. And people ask for critisism to achieve greatness
in the holy arts of pixels. It is just hard for new artist to keep up
with the more seasoned ones. The WIP board is meant for help, it's up
to the admins to decide if the piece is worthy of being in the gallery,
taking into account the standars in which the piece's creator is.
I said a lot and said nothing at all lol
|
Posted By: pixelblink
Date Posted: 14 March 2006 at 4:28pm
okay guys... you've done good so far. Here's the answers from my perspective:
- hell no... I drew that in 2 seconds
- 10 seconds here... no
- 30 seconds... obvious. This is what some of the stuff looks like that is slipping through form time to time though
- I'd let this one slide. It shows some effort even though it could definitely use some more. I'd let something like this be approved then let the rest of the PJ members attack it if it was merited. Then it could be suggested it go to the WIP section of the forums.
- Not by me. The number one thing would be becuase there's no transparent background. Couldn't care less about the rest (though I did spend a good 10 minutes or more on this one)
- Nope! This was hypothetically submitted by someone else (trick question). "They" took my image and added some hair. Dirty bastards... none of you could tell the difference between the hair and the rest?

Anyways, these are just SOME of the issues we come across while trying to judge an image for approval.
Okay, another role playing thingy here. I'm a noob and one of my images was not approved. I freak out on you... "what the f**k?? why did my image not go through while all your gallery is filled with complete sh*t? take this site and shove it up your ass." I continue to submit various half assed images, some of spongebob squarepants in different poses, etc. some pics of your mom... whatever. I also start flaming every conversation I can. How would you diffuse this situation
-------------
|
Posted By: jalonso
Date Posted: 14 March 2006 at 4:47pm

Perfect example:
1- Not accepted under any circumstance.
2- Could be accepted if its known to be created by someone under 12yo
who states in their description that their desire is to learn pixelart
and wishes to get involved. With this scenario I would encourage and
even teach a trick ot two.
3- This one is tougher but still acceptable as a first or second
submission, however if 10 submissions later the same skill level is
present then a flag should be raised somehow.
4- Although horrible its acceptable. I don't like its style, coloring
and overall dinkyness but it is pixelart, just not my cup of tea. This
person could easily improve and encouragement will help.
5- Is NOT acceptable because this level of pixel skills tells me the
artist is being lazy and a complete a-hole who did'nt even bother to
remove the background, offer a palette or anything that contributes in
any way, ie. funny, clever, smart, though-proviking, and assumes that
because their skills are solid any kind of crap/doodle is something to
be sent straight into the hall of fame This is the worst kind of
offense I find at PJ. It drives me nuts to no ends. 
6- This is for the WIP thread and NOT acceptable to the main site. This
is obviously a technically skilled individual who may have just started
with hair details and perhaps color theory or effects and would benefit
from help before accepted in the main site where you would probably
find this type of decription, "This is so and so, I know the hair sucks
and the colors are weird, and I wasn't in the mood to make transparent
but hey I'm bored at school so I thought I would post it since I
haven't posted in like 6 days. hehe , c+c welcome."
So its relative to how long the individual has been part of the PJ
community, their known skill level, previous examples. I will comment
directly on the art work rather than PM because it makes the point by
example to the individual and those who view the artwork too. At times
it calls for harsh, other times nice and gentle.
------------- http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9378&FID=6&PR=3 - PJs FAQ <•> http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_topics.asp?FID=6 - Sticky Reads
|
Posted By: 0xDB
Date Posted: 15 March 2006 at 2:16am
Originally posted by pixelblink
Okay, another role playing thingy here. I'm a noob
and one of my images was not approved. I freak out on you... "what the
f**k?? why did my image not go through while all your gallery is filled
with complete sh*t? take this site and shove it up your ass." I
continue to submit various half assed images, some of spongebob
squarepants in different poses, etc. some pics of your mom... whatever.
I also start flaming every conversation I can. How would you diffuse
this situation
Put a "post cap" to the misbehaving newbie. That would be a limitation
on how many posts per day or week someone is allowed to make in total.
This could be lifted again, if an improvement of the subjects behaviour
can be seen.
I don't know how hard it would be to implement that feature but i think
it would be a powerful measure to convert at least some laserbrains
into useful members, as it gives them a chance to realize that they are
trolling/flaming/spamming and they can use their few allowed posts
wisely(if they want to) to show that they are willing to change their
inappropriate behaviour.
------------- http://www.dennisbusch.de/index.php - 0xDB | https://twitter.com/dennisbusch_de - twitter
|
Posted By: inkspot
Date Posted: 25 March 2006 at 4:23am
Yes, admins should be more strickt and not let the site be ruined. Rules say that if your background is just a plain colour, then it must be transparent, most things are not.
Every time I upload something into the gallery, I waste my time by making previews and adding transparency, photosop opening takes time.
But pixelblinks last problem has an easy solution -- ban, ip ban if needed. hell I've been banned from forums just because people didn't believe that my pixelart is mine and they didn't believe that such things are completely hand-pixeled. I told them that they are f**king pricks and got my ip banned.
|
Posted By: Larwick
Date Posted: 25 March 2006 at 6:32am
Hmm, i think if art is disapproved the user should be given a reason for it so they can improve the piece and resubmit it rather than come into the forums and complain. I don't know whether there is already something like this though, cus i've never been disapproved *gloats*.
-------------
http://larw-ck.deviantart.com">
|
Posted By: Brian the Great
Date Posted: 27 March 2006 at 10:13am
Here's what I'd do:
1: Revise- general quality standards
2: Revise- same
3: Revise- no WIPs
4: Although by far not the best in the gallery, I'll let it slide. In addition, I'll give some C&C if I find the time to do so.
5: In
6: I'd check if the same member made it. Rating every piece in the gallery combined with a steel memory causes me to sport rippings fairly quickly.
|
Posted By: pixelblink
Date Posted: 27 March 2006 at 7:37pm
Good job Brian. You get a gold star!
Can you think of any other issue that has come up or might come up that we can address now regarding the approval process?
-------------
|
Posted By: Brian the Great
Date Posted: 28 March 2006 at 12:21am
I should be admin if I weren't already.
What about offending material? Where lies the thin line between offensive and opinion? Pretty recent subject I reckon.
|
Posted By: Aleiav
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 5:14pm
I don't think you should draw the line between offensive and opinion. People need to learn to respect other people's opinions, whether they're offensive or not. Censorship is sucky and stupid and it doesn't help anyone grow or learn anything.
-------------
|
Posted By: Shark
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 5:43pm
1, f**k right off
2, better than 3 but seems about 50% away from submission
standard
3, same as number 1
4, please see the wip section of the forum for a few touch ups.
5, i like this one i think its the best
6, it would appear that you have accidentally put some amazing hair
on a crap piece...(had you worried there).. lol not
6 this would be more like the normal shark:
KILL youself you dont deserve to use computers steal art and
adding sh*t hair onto it. you totally ruined a great piece. i hope you
didnt base that hair off you own cos u must look like a retard. go
hang yourself and your sh*tty ms paint editing skillz! w**ker!
hehe shark for admin!
------------- Snark, we love yuu.
|
Posted By: inkspot
Date Posted: 23 April 2006 at 9:57am
But no. 5 is missing transparency... Not approvable. So that only leaves no 6 and no 4 in special circumstances.
-------------
|
Posted By: Souly
Date Posted: 23 April 2006 at 12:21pm
Except the fact that 6 is obviously a rip and wouldn't be accepted. If part of the piece doesn't show the same quality as the rest of it assume it's an edit of an original piece.
------------- http://punky.ensellitis.com">
I am the jesus of PJ.
|
Posted By: PixelSnader
Date Posted: 23 April 2006 at 1:53pm
i would approve 4 and 5, even though 4 isnt technically of great quality and 5 hasnt got transparency. there's a ''transparency'' button in the galleries for a reason i think. sometimes a certain sprite just works better on a certain background.
as for the RP. i think i would start by telling him to calm down and whı his art wasnt accepted (eg. art standard, or rip etc.) if he were to calm down, ok, if he were to stay heated up after 2-3 warnings, i'd give him a temporary ban( 1-2 weeks) or some other way to not let him post as much. when all that fails i think i'd fall back on a (semi)permanent IPban, for say.. at least half a year. if by then he wouldnt be able to control himself
how about oekaki stuff?
-------------
▄▄█ ▄▄█
▄█▄ ▄█▄
|
Posted By: Brian the Great
Date Posted: 23 April 2006 at 3:55pm
I think oekaki usually is the same as 'general quality standards' or 'no WIPS'.
------------- http://www.twoschizos.com">
|
Posted By: Shark
Date Posted: 10 June 2006 at 8:45am
I am Pissed off. It may be an exceedingly hot day here in the UK,
which may add to my frustration, but to be honest i am sick of rating
stuff with one star in the gallery. It seems like the the 'random
unrated pixelart' button could be renamed 'random sh*tty icons'
button. I just feel the standards have way dropped. My art may not
be the best in the world but at least i put effort into it, and make sure
something is totally complete before adding it to my gallery.
Pixeljoint is about showcasing our art, yet also helping others to
improve. Everyday i see about 20 WIPs added into the gallery, yet
how many new topics are started here on the forum everyday?
It not just rushed unfinished pieces, its also the 'n00bey' [to be blunt
about it] works that took no longer than 10 minutes in MS paint. Yes
often we can quite hostile to 'n00bs' here on the forum, however we
generally want to increase the size of this small community and help
people that we were once improve. When i first came to pixel some
of my works were rejected, but i managed to work harder and
improve. Nowadays the work i submitted then would have easily
made it into the gallery.
I am just fed up of rating/viewing rubbish and feel that the
moderation standards of art that gets approved needs to be
increased drastically.
------------- Snark, we love yuu.
|
Posted By: Larwick
Date Posted: 10 June 2006 at 12:16pm
I agree.
-------------
http://larw-ck.deviantart.com">
|
Posted By: Monkey 'o Doom
Date Posted: 10 June 2006 at 12:28pm
Dittoz.
------------- http://pixelmonkey.ensellitis.com">
RPG is numberwang.
|
Posted By: pixelblink
Date Posted: 10 June 2006 at 12:29pm
I've been sending back loads and loads of stuff that needs revision.
You wouldn't believe some of the stuff we send back.
Of course, if you believe a piece has been approved in error, feel free to direct the member to utilize the WIP forum as well as informing an admin.
-------------
|
Posted By: jalonso
Date Posted: 10 June 2006 at 12:58pm
huh, yes there are some weak submissions but overall the entries have
been great and diverse since last month. I've been impressed by many
pieces... guess you can't always please everyone.
------------- http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9378&FID=6&PR=3 - PJs FAQ <•> http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_topics.asp?FID=6 - Sticky Reads
|
Posted By: Shark
Date Posted: 10 June 2006 at 1:00pm
Isn't that the moderators job?
On the other hand i did test you today by submitting some
purposefully bad work under a different username, and im glad to
see it wasnt approved. I still lfeel way too much sh*t gets through
though.
EDIT: damn fast jalonso. This post was aimed at PB
------------- Snark, we love yuu.
|
Posted By: pixelblink
Date Posted: 10 June 2006 at 1:36pm
maybe you should direct your energy towards critiquing the pieces in question rather than not helping at all. Of course, you could always start by not worrying about what other people do and focus on your own art but, since this is a community, why not contribute something constructive to help solve the problem at hand?
It's not necessarily a hot day here but, I'm getting sick and tired of certain people flying off the handle on n00bs rather than trying to help them in a positive way. It's become a "shoot first ask questions later" routine in this site when it should be the other way around.
-------------
|
Posted By: jalonso
Date Posted: 10 June 2006 at 1:39pm
AMEN
------------- http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9378&FID=6&PR=3 - PJs FAQ <•> http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_topics.asp?FID=6 - Sticky Reads
|
Posted By: Ensellitis
Date Posted: 10 June 2006 at 4:25pm
Sing it on the mountain, baby!
------------- ಠ_ಠ
There's a pubic hair on my keyboard. What the f**k?? I "mow the lawn" so it's not mine. Gross.
|
Posted By: Shark
Date Posted: 10 June 2006 at 4:57pm
Originally posted by pixelblink
maybe you should direct your energy towards
critiquing the pieces in question rather than not helping at all. Of
course, you could always start by not worrying about what other
people do and focus on your own art but, since this is a community,
why not contribute something constructive to help solve the problem
at hand?
I shouldn't have to critique pieces in the gallery. The point of the
gallery is finished works. If more people are directed to the forum i
will gladly critique. I also do not have time to crawl through the
gallery critising pieces that i doubt will ever get updated.
Originally posted by pixelblink
It's not necessarily a hot day here but, I'm getting sick and tired of
certain people flying off the handle on n00bs rather than trying to
help them in a positive way. It's become a "shoot first ask questions
later" routine in this site when it should be the other way around.
I'm not 'flying of the handle', i am expressing my opinions, in any
case this isn't directed at 'n00bs'. In the past yes i have been known
to overeact. 'Certain people' >.> hopefully that is not directed at
me, as i have changed my approach to the new folk.
EDIT: typos
------------- Snark, we love yuu.
|
Posted By: pinsent
Date Posted: 20 June 2006 at 7:47pm
Ive made a piece i think was pritty good. I know my art isn't the same style as most people on this site, but its pretty good and is better then some stuff i have seen on the published art forums. Am i being discriminated against because my art stlye is diffrent? I would like to use my own art as an avitar at least.
|
Posted By: pixelblink
Date Posted: 20 June 2006 at 7:57pm
your pieces were very oekaki-ish. Meaning, you didn't take the time to place each pixel piece by piece. Overall quality was lacking, hence the message to visit the forums and place your images in the work in progress section for helpful critiques so you can edit/update your images to be reviewed once again by the admin.
'nuff said
-------------
|
Posted By: pinsent
Date Posted: 20 June 2006 at 8:03pm
aight! how do i post a wip on the forum i click the little add pic button but it asks me for a web site that the pic is on ..... Thanks for replying so quickly!
nuff said kida sounded rude though... (not to be a cry babby though lol)
|
Posted By: pinsent
Date Posted: 20 June 2006 at 8:04pm
i just wan't some people to comment on my stuff, on paper im alot better just give me some time
|
Posted By: Azrael
Date Posted: 20 June 2006 at 8:05pm
you could use that piece for avatar, even it's not approve yet
------------- If you want it done rite, U gotta do it yourself!
|
Posted By: pinsent
Date Posted: 20 June 2006 at 8:15pm
Originally posted by Azrael
you could use that piece for avatar, even it's not approve yet
argggg... i go to change my avitar and it only allows me to scrole through a list of published works.......
and how do you place a picture in the WIP forum if the add picture link only allows me to link to a website and not post one from my desktop
|
Posted By: pixelblink
Date Posted: 20 June 2006 at 8:19pm
you asked this question in the thread you opened up... I http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2429 - answered it 15 minutes ago
-------------
|
Posted By: Schnauzer
Date Posted: 23 August 2006 at 9:17pm
Why some people can post comments before the pixel art is acepted?
Admins and mods advantage?
|
Posted By: Ensellitis
Date Posted: 24 August 2006 at 5:56am
anyone can. its called the public queue. goodbye.
------------- ಠ_ಠ
There's a pubic hair on my keyboard. What the f**k?? I "mow the lawn" so it's not mine. Gross.
|
Posted By: Schnauzer
Date Posted: 24 August 2006 at 10:32am
Where is ti?
How can I acces to others un-acepted works?
|
Posted By: Ensellitis
Date Posted: 24 August 2006 at 10:41am
you have to be a level 2 first. look at the ranks faq to see what you need
------------- ಠ_ಠ
There's a pubic hair on my keyboard. What the f**k?? I "mow the lawn" so it's not mine. Gross.
|
Posted By: VenomousNinja
Date Posted: 01 October 2006 at 6:43pm
I think that PA that would normally get DisApproved should go into a smaller gallery that anyone can view, but a gallery not included on the front page...
|
Posted By: Larwick
Date Posted: 02 October 2006 at 9:19am
Yeah, it's called the forum WIP section.
-------------
http://larw-ck.deviantart.com">
|
Posted By: Ensellitis
Date Posted: 02 October 2006 at 1:39pm
like larwick said... stuff that gets turned down doesnt just include bad pixel art, it also includes non pixel art, rips, and so on. the point of turning stuff down is to keep it from the gallery, if it just gets put into another gallery, then what is the point?
------------- ಠ_ಠ
There's a pubic hair on my keyboard. What the f**k?? I "mow the lawn" so it's not mine. Gross.
|
Posted By: keithburgun
Date Posted: 27 March 2007 at 11:44am
hey can anyone tell me why these "didnt get enough of a score" to pass?


Maybe for the 2nd one they didnt like that it was pre-blown up and has text on it or something but the first one?
|
Posted By: Stickman
Date Posted: 31 March 2007 at 8:08am
Hello there. I'm new to the forum and have been looking at the hall of fame. There are a few pictures that have raised questions on what is considered pixel art for this site. (I did try searching on this forum for a "What is not allowed on PixelJoint" but couldn't find anything. So please don't give me the Dhalsim "yoga FLAME!" if i missed something).
So my question is if there is a list on this site that shows what isn't allowed?
The obvious ones seems:
Blurring
Smudge
Smear
any others?
|
Posted By: Monkey 'o Doom
Date Posted: 31 March 2007 at 9:25am
You can't use any tool that does something you wouldn't be able to get PERFECTLY IDENTICAL results with using the pencil tool at 100% opacity and with antialiasing off. So if you apply any filter, or use the smudge, smear, dodge, burn, rotate (by angles not multiples of 90o tool, you're not going to be able to submit it to the gallery.
You can use things such as contrast adjustments that affect the picture as a whole, change only the palette, and don't add palette entries, just change existing ones.
------------- http://pixelmonkey.ensellitis.com">
RPG is numberwang.
|
Posted By: Stickman
Date Posted: 02 April 2007 at 6:31am
Aaahhh..thanks for that Monkey o Doom.
I think it would be really nice to add a list like this to the "Submit Pixel Art" rules.
(you see I wasn't aware that it's okay to change angles by multiples of 90) Is mirroring allowed?
|
Posted By: jalonso
Date Posted: 02 April 2007 at 8:47am
Mirroring is allowed but doesn't always look good. The lineart can be mirrored then colored so that the lightsource goes in the same direction. Sometimes straight out mirroring is OK on shmups, imo.
------------- http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9378&FID=6&PR=3 - PJs FAQ <•> http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_topics.asp?FID=6 - Sticky Reads
|
Posted By: Stickman
Date Posted: 03 April 2007 at 6:22am
Your right about the mirroring. It's a bit like when overseas companies used to "flop" Japanese comic books.
Boy...did the authors hate that....
|
Posted By: Kaz21
Date Posted: 19 October 2007 at 6:13pm
Do you think his is accept worthy?
I don't understand why is wasnt accepted because it really is better than alot of the other Lil Dude submissions and I used the appropriate colours only.
Kaz~
|
Posted By: Gerben
Date Posted: 27 October 2007 at 11:50am
May I ask why this graphic was refused? http://pixeljoint.com/pixelart/25538.htm
|
Posted By: Blueberry_pie
Date Posted: 27 October 2007 at 12:07pm
It's nice, but also very small and a fairly simple. If you have some other guns in that style, you could include them in that image. I'm sure it'll get approved then.
-------------
|
Posted By: Gerben
Date Posted: 27 October 2007 at 12:52pm
Thanks for the reply. Can I still use it as my avatar, or won't anyone see it?
|
Posted By: Blueberry_pie
Date Posted: 27 October 2007 at 12:54pm
Yeah, you're free to use it as your avatar. Everyone can see it.
-------------
|
Posted By: sondre
Date Posted: 28 December 2007 at 1:04am
Hi, I have received messages for some of my pictures that say "revision required". For "the tough guys" the reason is that the picture is unfinished (understandably, even though it first was accepted, then later was marked revision requred). For "neant", "sjenert" and "lost again" it says "not able to gather the score needed". What does "the score needed" mean? Do you want me to change the pictures, and in what way? Can people still watch them when they are marked "revision required"?
|
Posted By: Hapiel
Date Posted: 28 December 2007 at 1:40am
Originally posted by sondre
Hi, I have received messages for some of my pictures that say "revision required". For "the tough guys" the reason is that the picture is unfinished (understandably, even though it first was accepted, then later was marked revision requred). For "neant", "sjenert" and "lost again" it says "not able to gather the score needed". What does "the score needed" mean? Do you want me to change the pictures, and in what way? Can people still watch them when they are marked "revision required"? No we cant watch them, Yes its weird that tough guys was not accepted, and the score thing means that too many people voted no in the public queque. I dont know why they did so, I voted yes myself, but the mods just could not let it enter with so many people who voted no.
-------------
|
Posted By: greenraven
Date Posted: 28 December 2007 at 8:45am
Sorry sondre, you pieces were NPA (not pixel art). Too many colors from what I remember. 256 is the color limit here. Sorry.
-------------
"pwnage comes with patience, practice and planning." ~ Jalonso
|
Posted By: sondre
Date Posted: 28 December 2007 at 2:15pm
@greenraven: I don't get it. My pictures are pixel art according to any criteria people have spelled out to me, and they're all <256 colours.
Does this mean there's no point in having the pictures there? I was kind of happy as long as they were in the "queue" or whatever, so people could see them. Being accepted into your club is not such a big thing for me, but I posted the pictures so that people could watch them if they like them. I thought maybe "pixeljoint" would be a place people would actually appreciate the work that goes into pixel graphics, more than most demoscene graphicians these days.
|
Posted By: A.B.
Date Posted: 28 December 2007 at 2:32pm
Sondre, It was probably some that voted no because your art is too good. They automaticly thinks it is NPA. Even I wasn't sure, so I didn't vote. Can you make WIPs that can open in MS Paint? The current WIPs wont work on my computer, and I think that's the problem.
And the queue can only be viewed for level 2 members.
------------- Mah sig.
|
Posted By: Acherhar
Date Posted: 28 December 2007 at 2:34pm
A.B., you don't have to be level 2 to view the queue, only to vote yes or no.
|
Posted By: sondre
Date Posted: 28 December 2007 at 2:39pm
I mean, I didn't make the pictures exclusively for pixeljoint, I made them for various scene gfx compos and ephidrena demos. This site is just a place to show them to people who might be interested in that kind of thing. I'm not changing the pictures to have them accepted here, if that's what "revision" means. I was hoping they could be there even though some people do not like their style. But if nobody can see them I suppose there's no point in keeping them here.
|
Posted By: Acherhar
Date Posted: 28 December 2007 at 2:42pm
I agree sondre, it's a shame so many voted no, but maybe you can have a thread in diversions and post them there? They really were beautiful.
|
Posted By: greenraven
Date Posted: 28 December 2007 at 3:48pm
sondre, I actually voted "yes", but unfortunately I'm not a mod so that's as far as I can go.
A.B., anyone can view the queue, only level 2's can vote.
-------------
"pwnage comes with patience, practice and planning." ~ Jalonso
|
Posted By: pixelblink
Date Posted: 28 December 2007 at 5:28pm
I was originally writing this up in response to NotSure's rants in another thread but it also applies to this one:
Fellas, gals, and pixie pony dustesses or whatevers,
First and foremost it was mentioned that colour limitations should not
matter. Well it does. If you want to use every and any colour possible
without limitations, why are you on this site? Why try pixel art at
all? Open up your Photoshop or whatever it is you use and spraypaint
and smudge and whatnot to your hearts content, just don't submit it to
this site.
Pixeljoint does not tell people what to do with their lives and their
art. We just tell people that this site has set guidelines on what one
can submit. There are a ton of other sites out there waiting for you if
you choose you don't like the guidelines we set.
Secondly, pixel art has evolved out of the old school platforms.
I find that there are two kinds of artists joining up on this site:
1) artists that want to conform to a set of technical limitations
2) artists that used to conform to limitations that were imposed
because of the technical aspect in the medium of which they worked on.
in the latter, it seems that the focus is on the art itself and not the
medium in which it's presented. Again, there are other ways to present
this art instead of calling it pixel art (as one might have in the old
days)
in the former, I find that these are artists looking to gain some
insight into the retro days of gaming as well as pushing the artistic
scope by limiting their pallettes and whatnot. THIS is the focus of the
site in my opinion.
Thoughts? Comments? Jal, I know you've something to add
|
Posted By: jalonso
Date Posted: 28 December 2007 at 5:35pm
I couldn't agree more. I do have more to add but need to stew for a little bit.
------------- http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9378&FID=6&PR=3 - PJs FAQ <•> http://www.pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_topics.asp?FID=6 - Sticky Reads
|
Posted By: Larwick
Date Posted: 28 December 2007 at 5:35pm
I think the ones who know what they're talking about as PA which we know is NPA (in our terms) don't like the fact we have labelled pixelart in a different way to themselves or others. They forget that because of this other people should respect our views as a community and follow our guidelines if they wish to participate in the site.
If they wished to submit a complaint or suggestion for improvement there are appropriate ways to do so, most of the time they don't want to know.
-------------
http://larw-ck.deviantart.com">
|
Posted By: sondre
Date Posted: 29 December 2007 at 1:52am
@pixelblink: I think your categorisation corresponds quite well with my perception of most demoscene graphicians, who used to pixel but nowadays use photoshop and other non-pixel techniques. For my part, I used to pixel because those were the restraints of the tools I was using in the early 90s, but then I have continued to make lo-res 8bit pixel graphics later, simply because I like it.
@larwick: My problem is mainly that the criteria people give me for what is acceptable at pixeljoint corresponds to my own techniques, but still I'm told my pictures do not conform to the "guidelines".
My perception of what can be called "pixel graphics" is that every pixel should be chosen consciously and placed by hand, and that the colour count should remain <256. This is also the criteria people at pixeljoint give me when I ask them, and they apply to my own pictures.
|
Posted By: ScarredShadow
Date Posted: 11 January 2008 at 12:58pm
Sondre, most of your pieces seemed fine to me, but they were just so insanely cool, most people couldn't tell how they were made, despite you explaining to them. The tough guys wasn't accepted because it was unfinished, sending it back was really a call for you to finish it off. You should try resubmitting your work, see what happens.
|
Posted By: Shrub
Date Posted: 26 January 2008 at 12:58pm
Even though it will make it harder for my stuff to get accepted when I finish some pixel art, I think that your art should have to be very good to get through. There isn't much bad stuff on PJ, but a higher standard would mean better work in the gallery because people would have to get better if they want to submit stuff.
Being relaxed about it isn't a good idea at all, because it will result in the gallery beeing clogged up by lil' dudes and crappy pixel art, and filled up with 12yr old kids that tell their friends to join, which results in them spamming the forums saying "were do i get gd pixle maker program????? cuz ms paint iz ghey LOLOLOL!!!!!!11!1111". And others that open MS Paint and draw a few scribbles and put it in the gallery, and then invite THEIR friends, and so the cycle repeats.
Baaaad idea.
|
|