Revision? What reason?
Printed From: Pixel Joint
Category: The Lounge
Forum Name: Resources and Support
Forum Discription: Help your fellow pixel artists out with links to good tutorials, other forums, software, fonts, etc. Bugs and support issues should go here as well.
URL: https://pixeljoint.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2519
Printed Date: 13 September 2025 at 3:36am
Topic: Revision? What reason?
Posted By: Glow
Subject: Revision? What reason?
Date Posted: 02 July 2006 at 1:20pm
|
The PJ "system" seems to doubt I did this by hand. http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/7446/pre22hr.gif Flattering, but silly. This was done pixel by pixel, despite what some think. It started with the orangeish color, outlining my face, and adding shadows tweaking it slowly using the brush tool in PS. Then I made a new layer, and went over it pixel by pixel... Then just erased the brush layer, and added shadows and dither etc using the pencil tool. It was originally 5 colors but changed it to 3 using the PS, which is the only thing that wasnt done by hand. ...and if I need to prove my painting skills, I can post other stuff I've done via PS. - GLOW |
Replies:
Posted By: Di0xygen
Date Posted: 02 July 2006 at 2:03pm
|
It does look like a color reduce to me.. random dithering, and out of place highlight pixels.. are all signs of color reduce. ------------- c==3 |
Posted By: Larwick
Date Posted: 02 July 2006 at 2:33pm
|
Post other stuff you've done via PS. -------------  http://larw-ck.deviantart.com">
|
Posted By: Glow
Date Posted: 03 July 2006 at 4:10pm
| glowgfx.deviantart.com |
Posted By: Souly
Date Posted: 03 July 2006 at 4:21pm
|
He asked for other examples of pixel art that you've done in PS. Not random sh*tty brush arts that you've done in PS. ------------- 
I am the jesus of PJ. |
Posted By: Ensellitis
Date Posted: 03 July 2006 at 4:59pm
|
it is a reduce, i have no doubt to that... and who the f**k cares what you did in PS if it isn't pixel art? how is that helping your case? ------------- There's a pubic hair on my keyboard. What the f**k?? I "mow the lawn" so it's not mine. Gross. |
Posted By: Aleiav
Date Posted: 03 July 2006 at 5:13pm
|
Originally posted by Ensellitis
it is a reduce, i have no doubt to that... and who the f**k cares what you did in PS if it isn't pixel art? how is that helping your case? Maybe he used layers to pixel trace over it? That's supposed to be a good thing? ------------- |
Posted By: Glow
Date Posted: 04 July 2006 at 1:58pm
|
Wow very mature? And Im surprised by how offensive you guys get. First off I know how I did this, so I don't know why you are arguing, it started off like I said. With 5 colors, and then reduced to 3 using PS dither tool. Which is the reason for the random dithering. It's very easy to paint people (almost picture perfect) using even paint: http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/8146/paint4is.jpg As for my PS paintings, lets see you do better? For your information Mozilla was interested in purchasing the firefox painting, I kid you not. Of course you will argue and throw insults my way... But I dont care. I have removed the image from my gallery just to keep away from idiotic remarks like yours. Ill post 100% pixel by pixel art from now on, and you can judge my skill based on how good they are. |
Posted By: Sythius
Date Posted: 04 July 2006 at 2:03pm
| I think their good, but I'm still in 2 minds that ya just simplified them with that dither tool... 0,o.. |
Posted By: Larwick
Date Posted: 04 July 2006 at 3:55pm
|
Glow, i think you've been clearly mistaken as to what pixel art is. If you use a tool, which has different dithering patterns, and scribble it all over a canvas, that can't be called pixel art. That's Oekaki, i'm afraid. This site doesn't cater for Oekaki works at the moment. As for the 'insults'. When a member is refusing to accept their work isnt pixel art, and become patronising, it's hard for the dedicated members here not to get a little rowdy. Sorry if you've felt a little withdrawn by it all, but that's just the way it goes. It's not a good idea to try and pursue the argument, but still i must point out your hipocritical comment of us being immature, when you start saying things such as: Originally posted by Glow ...lets see you do better? We'll be looking forward to some '100% pixel by pixel art' you'll be sharing with us later. ~Peace out. ------------- http://larw-ck.deviantart.com">
|
Posted By: Saboteur
Date Posted: 04 July 2006 at 5:01pm
|
Rule number one of PixelJoint : Noobs walk a thin, thin line. Stray from it, and we'll set you on fire. Endure the fire and press on anyhow and EVENTUALLY we'll come to accept you. Unless you're an idiot. ------------- "I was minding my own business and walking across a pebbled path, and a Duck started giving me the business." |
Posted By: Shark
Date Posted: 04 July 2006 at 5:09pm
|
its not that we dont like n00bs - when we say something against
there "preicous work" that was done in 10 mins "and better than anything we could do" they always flip out. Normally resulting in the whole community mobbing them, normally led by me :P You cant expect to not recieve negative comments on something you did with a dither tool, we can spot something non-pixel a mile off. Getting angry at these comments is why people hate you. Revision? What reason? Because you didnt make this by hand - it aint pixel art it doesnt go in the gallery. Just a warning, dont even mention color reduction and dont get larey to us. This is our community, you can either fit in and be a part of it, and get along with us, or flame at us and then we exile you. the decision is yours..... [@ mods - lock this up] ------------- Snark, we love yuu. |