Challenge winner [thUg] challenges you to create a portrait of a Two-Face type character, like the character from Batman, but not necessarily with a human side.
Examples: robot/animal, boy/girl, alien/human, firecreature/watercreature, etc...
Canvas Size- Max 100 x 100.
Colours - Max 16.
Transparency - No.
Animation - Optional.
The challenge thread will have all the challenge updates. The thread is also a great place to post your WIPs.
No exceptions! Add a background. Having no transparency is part of the challenge. Why bother submitting something to a challenge if you aren't following the rules? If you're ignoring one of the rules, why not just ignore them all and submit something entirely different altogether to the gallery?
Ok. I just posted my entry and realized there was 'no transparency' in this challenge. Is this really that important? My entry has no background so I made it transparent. I could put it in a white or colored box, but that's usually frowned upon in the gallery. I know this is supposed to be a portrait which usually has a background or backdrop, but mine is animated. Any exceptions here? Thanks.
Yeah, won't hurt anything, it'd just be more of a challenge to get that same contrast using assymetrical halves.
O :
Well, yes, left/right is the most logical, but if you really want to do top/bottom we're not stopping you.
I think the artistic purpose of Two-Face being drawn as left/right halves is to show the contrast between the two sides. The two sides are symmetrical and alike, but are very different.
I honestly think drawing a two-faced character with a top/bottom halving would defeat the purpose of making it two-faced.
o_O
Just make a portrait of a character that is comprised of two different halves. So yes, a rotating character would be ok.
What about an animated, rotating, 3D, half-face?
Sorry for all these questions. (speaking on behalf of others.)
I feel the left/right halfing is implied, but as it does not explicitly state otherwise, I don't suppose it will hurt to allow it.
Top/bottom halfing is hereby permitted.
I was under the impression that any half of the face was acceptable. It doesn't say anything about it having to be exclusively left/right (aside from the fact that the original character is left/right)...
Quake: Two different faces, faces that obviously do not belong to the same individual.
vampireslug: I'll have to check with [thUg] for a final word, but I'm not sure if he'll be on to make the call. Until then the rule is left/right halves of the face, as I'm sure was intended.
Edit: scratch that, do top/bottom if you really feel like it
does it need to physcially two different faces, or can we do like different characteristics or expression?
Mind you, i mean very different expressions.
Will the face have to be bisected into left and right or can it be top and bottom?
 |  |  |  |
I realized after I uploaded it. It wasn't intentional. I was using iaza on dail up so it took some time. So I figured I'd ask. Sorry.