Rayquaza

Rayquaza

You need to be logged in to rate pixel art.

 

Pixel Art Details

Rayquaza



user
Title: Rayquaza
Pixel Artist: Ego  (Level 6 Commander :: 5609 points)
Posted: 12/2/2010 23:28
Palette: 16 colors
Statistics:  13 comments    10 faves    0 avatars

Hey, a piece I worked on today and yesterday. This: http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b330/maxdxam/Rayquaza_sketch.png is a sketch I made about a year ago that I found while digging through my old-papers box. I remember making it without a reference, so it isn't a perfect match for Rayquaza's design, but I think it went over pretty well. I built the piece right over it, but that's okay if it's my own drawing, right?

So yeah. Bigger than my usual comfort zone. I know the body gets a little thicker, but eh, I'm okay with that.

Enjoy, I'd love feedback.

EDIT: Thanks to Manupix, I've made some adjustments, but they are incomplete. The final two segments are still original, so they may conflict with the rest of the style/lightsource/etc. This will be corrected soon. The original is here if you'd like to see it:

http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b330/maxdxam/Rayquaza_pa_fin.png

I know the arm is still missing. It will be remedied soon.

EDIT2: Alright, done, I think. VERY happy. Other arm is only rudimentary, and a total cop-out, but I was having trouble with it. Enormous thanks to Manupix for the fantastic edit and advice.

EDIT3: Finally changed the preview pic.

EDIT4: In case you don't know him, Rayquaza is a Pokemon(and is thus (c)Nintendo). He is #384. I didn't use any specific reference, so just Google his name if you want to see the official design.

Discussion

If you would like to comment you will need to be logged in. Register now. It only takes a moment and it's free.


user
Ego (Level 6 Commander) @ 12/30/2010 19:39

Yes it is, and thank you very much!

I suppose I should include that it's a pokemon in the description. Thanks for reminding me of that.


user
NobleValerian (Level 6 Manager) @ 12/30/2010 17:38

 that looks really good... is it a pokemon?


user
Ego (Level 6 Commander) @ 12/7/2010 16:15

Thanks. I suppose I should drop any altered shading at all on the yellow to stay true to the character. I makes it so boring to just do one long segment though, so I think I'll make it slightly raised; not very raised, just a little to break some monotony. I've already taken a couple other liberties with the design, so I'll just do that.

Thanks again!


user
Manupix (Level 11 Godzilla) @ 12/7/2010 04:25

Good work!

Good point using the greys for secondary light, I hadn't even thought of picking them from where they were :/

The yellow markings do appear raised in both your versions, which is why I emphasized them. If they aren't, they shouldn't have any gradients other than following the main body shading, as in the neck.


user
Ego (Level 6 Commander) @ 12/7/2010 00:48

Thank you so much! As you can see from the edit, I've saken a good number of your changes to heart. I'd never considered the parts' interactions with each other. Regarding the palette, I softened the top green a little bit to allow the yellow to show a bit more, and used the gray from the claw to buffer the red in the shadows. I also used the claw's blue to start some work on the secondary light on the bottom. The unfortunate part about the tones is that the character mandates that they remain quite saturated. I think that I can get away with the saturation if I use the claw/tooth colors as buffers though, so that should be alright.

One part I didn't follow your edit on was the yellow markings. They're actually a part of the flesh and aren't raised, and the way you played the shadows on them gives them their own depth, which they don't have.

One thing I'm considering is shortening the upper body a  bit. It seems unnecessarrily long and gives me the impression of a rigid tube for much of it, so I'll probably try that out.

All in all, I think that it's looking much better so far thanks to you. The rest should be updated fairly soon, should my schedule allow it.


user
Manupix (Level 11 Godzilla) @ 12/4/2010 06:38

Some issues, addressed. No need to simplify the head! Mostly, it's about how light falls on surfaces, according to how more or less they face the light source. Also how each part casts shadows on other parts (locally; I disregarded the main cast shadow the upper body would cast on the tail). I don't like what i did on the lowest segment though. It should need some secondary light, which I unconvincingly started. That would look better with bluer hues. Other parts have a little reflected light from the body, keeping the main hues is ok there.

Your palette might need some adjustment: you have rather separate greens, then yellows, then reds; all of which in rather grouped saturations. You need some more neutral colors to act as buffers between them. I reused the bright yellow as highlight for all colors and dark red as shadow, but that would work better (esp shadows) if these tones were more neutral.

Also I agree large smooth parts are more difficult, I'm stuck on a piece for just that reason!


user
Ego (Level 6 Commander) @ 12/3/2010 23:53

Okay, I don't know how to reply to all of you, but thank you for all the comments everyone! In regards to the mysterious missing, arm, it's just that; a mystery. As in, it's a mystery how I forgot to draw the other arm. I'm making it now, it'll be edited in very soon. Particular thanks to Sneep, for your very kind words.

@Manupix: I would definitely agree with you that it is inconsistent. I started with the head and worked along down a segment at a time. When I did the head, I found it much easier to texture it due to the complexity of the face. Unfortunately, I found it remarkably harder to provide the same level of detailed texture to the smooth body. I don't like the arm, and the neck I can percieve how to fix, so those I can work on. Unfortunately, in order to make it consistent through the entire piece, I would need to simplify the head shading, which I'd rather not do. Manupix, if you could describe the "some issues" I may be able to change them.

Sai, does my response to Manupix cover the confusing shading you mentioned?


user
HCGamer (Level 2 Quiet One) @ 12/3/2010 20:41

Yeah, where's that other arm? :P


user
Manupix (Level 11 Godzilla) @ 12/3/2010 13:31

The shading on the head gives it excellent volume and matter. Unfortunately it's not that consistent everywhere! The 'neck' and arm segment are flat by comparison, it gets better again below that with some issues.


user
Sai (Level 7 Sheriff) @ 12/3/2010 11:46

Rayquaza is my favorite pokemon of all time. I like the palette, but shading is all over the place. The shading changes in light source from one segment to the next, so i gets a bit confusing.



user
KrypToniTe (Level 5 Soldier) @ 12/3/2010 05:09

Yeah, one handed Rayqyaza? In every other thing I agree with Sneep...


user
HummingBird (Level 1 Thug) @ 12/3/2010 04:45

Great and fluid, but wheres the other arm?


user
Sneep29 (Level 4 Deputy) @ 12/3/2010 03:22

Some great lighting, and shading. Colors are great, lines are just superb, and the AA on the lines look like it's a sprite straight from a game. It's really cool just to look at.


Related & Tags


rayquaza pokemon green, Rayquaza avatars, Rayquaza icons, Rayquaza pixel art, Rayquaza forum avatars, Rayquaza AOL Buddy Icons

Sponsored Products

Donate

Want to give some dough back to all those amazing pixel artists? Donations provide prize money for contests, help cover hosting costs and support new initiatives.

Farm Fresh Sketch Comedy
Play party games with QuizBash app
Play party games with QuizBash app

Report Problem

If you are going to report an issue with this piece please provide relevant URLs/Images to back up your claim on PJ Discord.

Register

If you would like to be a team player why not register? It's quick and easy and you'll be able to comment on, rate and upload pixel art.

Already Registered?