 |
| ||||||||||
Hi. These are quite obviously heavily inspired by Vic's sprite and they're probably edits of it. Is there anything intrinsically wrong with this? No, but it's not allowed here without the artist's explicit permission. You're welcome to ask Vic to stop by here and give this the ok, but in the meantime I'm going to have to send this back once again.
Thanks for understanding, and sorry for the nasty comments.
Yeah i honestly don't see what you guys are talking about with him copying vic and such.
it aint similar at all in my opinion, at least he took the initiative to use a reference like that in the first place, and thats if he did. imo many things are based on many other things, doesent mean that you need to call it stealing/ripping/copying.
(pretty much disagreeing with mataru there :D)
Just becuase I make new line art, new pattle, shade, variations, and others does not mean its 'ripped'
rip,ripped,and other variations of that word mean directly copied/stolen from a outside source that does not offer a open source version of said item.
Now words like 'new' 'variatied' 'modded' 'based' 'referanced' and 'roughly styled the same' all mean that a new item is similar to a old item, but not the same item.
Also as I have recently just looked at Vic's work, it seemse only ONE part of my larger part is similar to his (hers?), which would not even closely make it 'ripped'.
I hope that makes sense to you, and also can you please stop being so blatently childish? It is quite rude to others, and myself when people do such things.
AT YOU! Just because you shade and stuf dosen't mean that it is not a rip!
Who was that pointed at, and why are you trying to post bbc on a non-bbc place?
Yes i agree! Can you stop being so DAMN STUBBORN!? [img]http://www.clipartguide.com/_named_clipart_images/0511-1003-1003-0878_Stubborn_as_a_Mule_Metaphor_clipart_image.jpg[/img]
Right, Sure.
Same could be said for anything YOU make, though this is my opinion, and that is yours.
I'll be the better man, and respect that opinion.
its not based. its a shitty recolored resized edit of his work. you might well call that a false claim.
Also updated, resubmited for revision, and added your claims of base-ness.
Also antymattar, what does 'manned' mean?
I giggled at your false claims, but whatever, same thing can be said for any work for any reason.
Ay man, dont you think he should have atleast stated that he has ever evin seen vic?
don't you get manned for that?
this is basically a resized version of Vic's TF2 sprites. and ireally doubt you ever asked for permision or had any idea from where this came from, so its basically an edit from someone else's work without mentioning anywhere that this ain't yours at all.
just sayin'
atleast I said that I learned from vic you b******! This is clearely a ripof! When I learned from his piece I actualy made something new not modified it!!!
Some say they can out smart me... Maybe,
but I have yet to meet one who can out smart pixel art
*powpowpowpow* AAAHHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!
I Am Heavy Weapons Guy, And This is My Heavy Pixel Collection.
It cost 400,000 dollars to see this pixel art...for twelve seconds.
Alright, I'll go talk to vic.